| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 4,160 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5397 Posts |
Indeed CV. Pop is not high that is for sure! It is truly what everyone can agree on....... NEAT. A marker for this variety is an always weak second 8.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1352 Posts |
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1442 Posts |
Thanks bosox! I'll have to go find one  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
bosox..out of curiosity, which year? :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
Does anyone know if PCGS is recognizing this variety?
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10458 Posts |
PCGS was pretty generous calling that an AU-58...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
I could have sworn I saw a PCGS # for this variety somewhere but can't find it  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
324 Posts |
Great coin but AU-58? I think that's rather generous. Looks VF-35 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
LOL...wow, a lot of haters hating on the coin. Anyone see a better example? I think Hugh Powell has a cleaned AU with hairlines, that's about it.
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10458 Posts |
No hating here, but an AU-58 usually only has the finest of circulation wear on the highest points of the devices, and almost no marks in the fields... in this case, the entire cheek of the Queen has been impacted.
Ask yourself this question. If you saw that very coin in a dealers case at a coin show, raw inside a 2.2 flip, and the coin dealer wrote AU-58 on that 2x2 flip - would you have a discussion about said grade of that coin?
My original point was not about finding a better example of this variety. I know weaker strikes can be an issue with that series, and I have no problems calling it an AU. I just commented that PCGS was generous with this coin, because I would have expected an AU-50 or AU-53 grade from them, at the most.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
 I was thinking more of the "VF35" comment lol...the coin has almost full lustre, maybe the angle makes it look worse..I think PCGS may have gone with eye appeal...but it's probably closer to AU53 than AU58... I bought this from Hugh Powell before the variety was published and before he doubled the prices (and rightfully so - this is the COOLEST NFLD variety! https://www.newcancoinsandcurrency....oundland.php  Edited by canadian-varieties
11/10/2017 4:36 pm
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
324 Posts |
VF-35 was just my opinion mate. If that comment really upset you then I'm sorry. I think most people agree that the coin appears to be over graded.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
851 Posts |
This is a coin you won't soon forget eyeballing.
Definitely a sexy AU coin. I'd love to have it!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 4,160 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/08/2015 7:52 pm
