Aelius ?

It may be but without more detail in the pic it is hard to tell if we see a raised leg or just some corrosion giving the impression of a leg.
Try doing this
Take a smear of some innocuous oil ( mineral oil or even vasaline) and gently rub the surface. You might be able to get a picture which shows more than what you have in the original.
It won't hurt the coin and may actually make it look a tad better. At the very least it will create some reflective surface which the camera will show as detail.

Does seem to show a cornucopia. The focus is the main issue now though.
I think you might try placing the coin on a dark surface and taking more than a few pics.
Surely some of them will be focused ! Then try using light from different directions.

We will crack this nut one way or the other !

Maybe this can help ?

When you zoom out it looks better. I 've taken the pictures with a Canon EOS 600D but it is a very difficult coin to take a picture of because the lens that we have isn't a good one to zoom on such a coin.

I have the book ERIC II and when I look by Aelius and if I look at the coin the only possibilty would be that it is Felicitas with caduceus at the left and cornucopia right. But the problem is that it then would be a sesterius wchich it can't be of his weight. So then we have to look like you said at Hadrian. When you look at the right the symbol that it could be : cornucopia/trident/rudder and at left it could be a patera or maybe a scale. See my drawing.

Just one decent pic of the obverse would be very helpful.

With the thousand reverse angles we now have I agree it seems to be a cornucopia !

Here is a coin almost the same on behalf the bust.

Thx for all the help guys.
I just made a collage of the pictures where you can see it all a bit better. New opinions are welcome.