| Author |
 Replies: 34 / Views: 6,248 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5404 Posts |
It goes to show you the capabilities of PCGS and their wonderful knowledge of the Canadian and provincial series. If it is as you say .925 silver (XRF) ,there is nothing else it can be except struck on a Newfoundland planchet. Wonderful piece SPP !
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
Jack....you doubt me.....I am hurt..............MM LOLOL was in a CCCS hard holder stating on NFLD pl, PCGS put 10 cents LOLOL
|
|
Valued Member
United States
493 Posts |
That is a stunner of a coin. Thanks for posting!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5404 Posts |
MM I would never doubt the Gospel of Nickelsguy! Just the wisdom of the US plastic Gods. Brings up another point to ponder about SPP neat error. Is it possible that there are some sterling silver Canada George VI ten cents out there? Hmm......
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Cool coin.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Literary Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10463 Posts |
Possibly, but there are metallurgical issues with just doing surface analyses on Canadian silver coins... due to the annealing and rolling, silver ions migrate outward to the surfaces of the coins when being rolled, and also during the strike. Any mint state silver dollar under the XRF will show enriched silver values, right up to sterling levels... so the XRF is not conclusive or absolute if this was a NFLD 10c or a normal Canadian 10c. PCGS probably took the safe route by just calling it Canadian (knowing that the RCM also minted NFLD coins). See this paper, there is a section in there on modern struck silver alloy coins: Beck., L., Bosonnet, S., Reveillon, S., Eliot, D. and Pilon, F. 2004. Silver surface enrichment of silver-copper alloys: a limitation for the analysis of ancient silver coins by surface techniques. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Vol. B226, p. 153-162. "Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Taiwan
606 Posts |
Just a superb error. Thank you for sharing and explaining
the approach taken by PCGS. It certainly makes sense.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1472 Posts |
Coming home to Zonad, after staying with Mikey for a while. Thanks Mikey, and Roger.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
491 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
I was just talking to a friend about this coin last night, glad to see that it is going to a great home(not that it wasn't before). A truly amazing example of an early wrong planchet(and possibly wrong country planchet?) Error.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10463 Posts |
Randy, it has a good home now, and I am very pleased to know that it now joins your other outstanding Canadian errors. I _was_ tempted to keep it, mainly to use it as future "Zonad trade-bait"...  Congrats sir!! "Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1581 Posts |
Quote:
but PCGS would not agree with us
Amazing. So, in addition to being able to see coins grade at, we foolishly consider, points higher, they have the ability to determine the planchette alloy with their naked eyes? Quote:
1969 mint employees guys
Is that a LD reference? |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5404 Posts |
There was a lot of funny games and " production problems " going on in the late 1960 s (1967 to 1970 ) that resulted in unreal "errors" ,"oddities", and "fabrications". That said the 1969 Large Date ten cents is probably legitimate, based on the coins that have been accounted for. Most have been found from circulation. Personally I feel it is a similar variety to the Large Small crown 1906 25 cents.
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
I'm curious about the minting process with this one. Wasn't the collar 12-sided? Is the coin thinner and wider than a normal 10c? (i.e. the metal spreads out a bit)
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 34 / Views: 6,248 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 03/27/2015 11:37 am
