| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,731 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
33 Posts |
I will have to post the photos tomorrow. I will have to get a different camera. To answer your questions the coin doesn't look like it has a scratch. it looks very sharp. Thank you all for your post and patients while a get a camera that is working.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Gorgeous, and bigger pics would help, 65RB
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Yeah, larger pics are needed.
This coin is Cn so the RD, RB, BN designations need not apply.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
New Member
 United States
33 Posts |
I just posted new photos. I think these are better.
|
|
New Member
 United States
33 Posts |
is it my eyes? I think I see a double die reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Germany
1852 Posts |
That is a beautiful cent. With my limited experience I would grade it MS64 at least.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
Looks more lustrous and has fewer spots than my 1859 IHC which is graded NGC MS-64. So, I'd think it deserves a 65. Very nice example of this 1-year type coin! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
33 Posts |
Thank you all for your opinions, but does anyone see a double die reverse?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
I see what you see. We would need close ups of the devices to be conclusive. And be careful if you do send it in to get graded. Your coin will come back with saliva all over it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
278 Posts |
Sell me this coin. MS 64 RB for me. You've got a wonderful example here!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,731 |
Page 2 of 2
|