| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 2,595 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Yeah, MS64 for sure and it looks semi proof like. Really nice looking '85-S.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18702 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I think it could make MS-65.
|
|
Valued Member
 Norway
148 Posts |
Seems like most agree that this is a MS64. Well. Here's what NGC called it:  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 What are we missing? |
|
Valued Member
United States
368 Posts |
Interesting.....there must be something on the cheek that is just not showing in the photos good? The fields look problem free.....the cheek is the only concerning spot for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Maybe the fingerprint on the stars in front of liberty's face had something to do with it as well?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
Boy, I'm not seeing that at all, either. Maybe it ought to be broken out and resubmitted to PCGS to see if it comes back the same.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Valued Member
Norway
148 Posts |
The fingerprint is only on the slab.
Yes, there is actually a couple of tinzy-winzy stripes on the cheek, which I couldn't see when I shipped it, and they are near impossible to see. It's still a wonder to me why they detailed it. When I think of improperly cleaned coins, I would say harshly polished ones etc.
No matter, I can't be bothered to resubmit it. In my mind it's problem free, but that's just life, isn't it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Oops. I was zoomed in on the coin when I saw the print. Those graders see so many that if they notice the slightest sign of a cloth rubbing they might details it. It's happened once or twice to me where they were so fine I didn't notice it until it hit the right angle or under a loupe
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
Wow. That is weird. I would have never guessed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9794 Posts |
Quote:
Those graders see so many that if they notice the slightest sign of a cloth rubbing they might details it.  probably detailed due to a wipe or a "thumbing". Hence one of the big pitfalls when trying to grade only from static photos. One really needs to be able to let the light wander across the surface and cartwheel to see hints of wipes or thumbing. "Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
Unless there is something that the photo is hiding I would resubmit this coin. I've looked at hundreds of thousands of Morgans in the last 45 years and I see absolutely nothing that would warrant a details grade! There is no broken luster, no hairlines, no polishing, etc. I don't remember if fingerprints warrant a details grade but if so I would think they would have to be very obvious...I do see some slight toning or yellowing on the cheek and maybe this was their concern, if clearer photos of the cheek area can be shown here maybe we could determine if indeed it was cleaned, otherwise I'm stumped.
Edited by 1893S
05/22/2015 09:51 am
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,595 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 05/20/2015 7:15 pm
