| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,872 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
VF, too much wear on the high points, especially on the obverse IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
VF-30. Looks like nice original surfaces!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
Obverse looks closer to VF-30 but the reverse is stronger and might bring the overall grade to VF-35. Color and surfaces look original. Nice circulated type coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
288 Posts |
Strong VF and the reverse VF+
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
I think the reverse will bump it to VF35 !! Nice coin :)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
I'm with Coinfrog on this one. EF40
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
521 Posts |
I think the lower grades came in because my pics show a 'flat' or dull looking coin, while there is actually a nice luster present through the dark toning. I do agree that the reverse is stronger than the obverse and might have raised it to a 40. Looking at my pics, I would grade it lower, but in hand, it seems correctly graded at 40. Thanks all! 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,872 |
Page 2 of 2
|