| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,874 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Wow, It certainly looks like a 6?..but with the corrosion, hard to tell.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
The top parts of the loop (left and right) of the last digit in the date are of different thicknesses, the left side being thicker.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
That does look like an 1856 but I believe it is an 1858. It appears to be the small letter variety which is only found only 1858. Additionally, as stated by TypeCoin, the inside of the O of OF appears to be oval rather than squared. Another strong possibility is that this is an altered date. Many of the 1856 altered dates were made from the 1858 SL variety
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I'll say 58. but my first thought was a 6 .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
A 56 would just be too good to be true. I agree that it's an altered 58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Here is an edited pic of the OP's photo (messed with the exposure and zoomed in on the date)  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1021 Posts |
Definitely not an 1856. Should have large letters and the o in of is not the style used in 1856.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8520 Posts |
The F looks good but that might've been messed with too.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
220 Posts |
Thanks to all who weighed in on this. Should I get it looked at by an authority and destroyed?.....if it is fake then It shouldn't get a chance to re-enter the collecting ecosystem.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
Its not "fake" so much as altered. Put it in a 2x2 labeled as a 1856 and put "Altered date- 1858", or even just put it in as an 1858. Not illegal to own, in fact I believe you could get in worse trouble melting this coin than selling it as a 1856!
Edited by ChildOfTheWheat
11/26/2015 10:28 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
 And you just told us, too! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Quote:
in fact I believe you could get in worse trouble melting this coin than selling it as a 1856! No. You would DEFINITELY get into more trouble passing it off as something it is not. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
NiNGCumpoop- I am completing a FE & IHC set and it would be nice to have an altered date as part of my collection, even one that is in rough shape. If you are interested in selling, PM me and maybe we can work something out. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
Quote:
You would DEFINITELY get into more trouble passing it off as something it is not. Figured so, just said something that sounded like it COULD be true rather than looking up the facts. Sorry  Edited by ChildOfTheWheat
11/26/2015 10:31 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
After reading the all the posts before this one of mine,
the thought HAS crossed my mind that:
it could be an altered '58, which has then been very harshly treated to cover up the alteration work.
A lesser condition '58 would have been the candidate for the alteration, due to a lower cost risk.
Under these circumstances, this coin must be treated with a great deal of scepticism.
Edited by sel_69l
11/26/2015 4:45 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,874 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/25/2015 06:32 am
