| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,704 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
This a well struck coin with lots of luster. If we accept the fact that two dealers claim the color is natural and uncleaned then I would say MS65RD. Beautiful coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
I agree with IHGE. Stay away from this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I think it is completely natural. Most likely an MS Red. I have no idea what number it would have from thise pictures, but it could be 65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
OP has coin in hand. I do not see anything at all that would make me think this coin has been cleaned: fields look well done up with no hairlines, luster is evident in both pictures, no unnatural toning around legends or devices. The second picture makes the coin look PL. For those of you who are stating that the coin has been cleaned, what do you see that makes you suspect this? I have looked at a few dozen MS red's on Heritage and they look like this one, with varying degrees of red. Personally, I have a 63RB 1876 (PCGS) and a 64RB 1889 (PCGS/Eagle Eye) and they look like OP's coin but slightly more brown as you would expect from a RB IHC.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Edited by paralyse 12/20/2015 1:12 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8516 Posts |
I'm guessing the pics aren't representative of what the color looks like in hand. The first two pics if I saw it on ebay I would pass right on by but I trust Red's judgement with IHC's and figure it's bad pics.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1021 Posts |
Thanks for the replies....Im going to sign up for a PCGS membership in January and send this off with a few others. I'm sure Ive got 3 others to send in.
By the way, this is one of the mid 1880s dates that Rick Snow's guide says that "The color varies depending on the source of the metal. Since 1886, older coins were being melted for recoinage. The uniformity was difficult to maintain and many full red coins of the 1886-1888 years look slightly paler than other years before and after."
This coin is a paler red, but its still full red IMO.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
It really is very difficult to make a judgment from these pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
688 Posts |
I agree with paralyse, definitely MS-64 and I could see it as MS-65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
500 Posts |
She is a real beauty. Stop back by this spring and let us know how it graded! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
What the heck guys. this coin is a gorgeous full strike MS-65RD with a challenge to 66 . NOT cleaned IMO . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
MS-64 RD, possibly higher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
is it possible it could be a proof?
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1021 Posts |
This coin is not a proof....I own a few Indian cent proofs and this is definitely not one of them. I signed up for PCGS yesterday and as soon as I get my coupon and determine what other coins will be sent in, Ill get this off to them for grading.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,704 |
Page 2 of 2
|