| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,879 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
I'll take a stab... A 1914 Dan Carr Liberty nickel that's been circulating heavily for the last year ? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
Are you referring to the "unique" damaged one that looks like a four?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189117 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
I'm with Jbuck, 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
You know guys, he said characteristics (plural) so maybe the 4/1 isn't the only "characteristic" he's referring to?
Hope this isn't a troll trap
Edited by Cascade 04/11/2016 6:41 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
Well, this is the first I am getting the chance to log on and check the forum, please excuse me for keeping my critics waiting lol wink... I do apologize though. I also apologize for the image being small, I did not realize it was that small, every time I tried to upload it kept telling me it was too large so I did use the optimization feature here and just must not have gotten it right... I'll try again, I thank you all for your feedback, yes I do believe there is a possible over date, I wasn't completely sure which is why I'd asked you great people for help with it. Undermy magnification glass there seem to be a few more abnormalities but they are faint enough you'd likely need the coin in hand... I'm very new at this and trying to learn is all...
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
 I hope this pic is better
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Poland
3201 Posts |
Certainly better, but still quite fuzzy when zoomed in: 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
That picture is better, but I don't see anything out of ordinary, unless you are thinking there is 4 under that last 1. I think it took a hit and that caused the surface alteration, not a repunched date.
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
I am wondering if anyone can tell me, if you can see it, what the streaking across the coin may be. Upon close examination it appears to be somewhat of a layering, it spears as though the nickel (silverish color) is on top of the yellowing color? My husband and I are wondering if it's because the composition is 75% copper and 25% nickel? Or is it some sort of decomposition or perhaps someone tried to clean the coin?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
I guess you have us all stumped. I don't have any nickel that shows that effect... it's rather beautiful and cloud-like, especially in the SE field. Does the reverse show similar toning?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,879 |
Page 2 of 2
|