| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 1,976 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
First one looks like it lacks luster, second one looks like it was dipped but not cleaned (there is a HUGE difference!).
If I had to pick, i'd go with the later.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
282 Posts |
Do you see that scratch or something going through the "A" in "STATES"? And it continues with three distinct marks under the "ST". Would that be enough to warrant a damage grade?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
Hm... Maybe its a planchet flaw? I dont see any raised metal that would indicate it was a deep cut.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
The second coin seems to have stronger luster in spite of the possible dipping. Details are also considerably sharper and the CAC sticker is a plus. It does look like there is a hit on A of STATES but even so I think #2 is a better coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5683 Posts |
I like the second coin better due to nicer luster and sharpness. The mark over the A in STATES might be a shadow from a scratch on the holder. On the first coin, is there a smudge on the plastic that is causing lack of detail on the shield?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
Zurie - The seller confirmed that what looks like wear on the shield is actually a slab issue and not on the shield when I questioned the unusual wear for the grade.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Tough call, but I like the second one best.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
If I get the 2nd one and take it out of the slab - would it get back a semi-decent color in ten years?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Quote:
Type: Is there something specific that bothers you about the first coin? All I can see is a slight possibility of a very old cleaning. I am curious what I am missing. The first coin has lost nearly all of its luster (AU-53 would be more appropriate), has been dipped, and looks very "flat." The second coin seems very lustrous, but I believe the picture to be overexposed (which means the abundance of luster might be an illusion caused by the lighting). It looks very wrong and has been severely dipped. Edited by TypeCoin971793
06/02/2016 6:29 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18706 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
I like the first one best. Looks more original.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
I ended up taking the 2nd (the one with the CAC sticker) , and I think I made the correct decision. The seller seemed to have severely overexposed the shots. It's a really nice coin with amazing luster on the obverse - I forgot what it's called but it looks like a bar of light that twirls in a circle as the coin is tilted up and down. Thanks for helping out, CCF.   Edited by syeb
06/06/2016 9:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Yes, that looks much better. The term you are looking for is "cartwheel luster."  |
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
Ah, thanks Type, that's the word. I had a little brain freeze there.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
"Severely overexposed" is right. You made the right choice. Your pics make the 2nd coin look more like the 1st coin from pg. 1!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 1,976 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/02/2016 2:40 pm
