| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 1,882 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
Text book AU-58 IMO no lower.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1023 Posts |
You guys would be surprised. Perhaps the luster isn't showing well in the pics.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
It's not the luster that worries me, it's the scratches and the rub.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
The only reason I say AU-58 is because the highpoints are the only areas that look disrupted, not much but just enough to say it circulated, I dunno though.
Edit: What Paralyse said.
Edited by Optimist-numismatist 03/21/2018 9:40 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
The only think I'm sure about is that the reverse is MS. Weak strike MS. The obverse has questionable areas and the only way to make an accurate assessment is with an inhand inspection. Speculating from these pictures is like throwing darts at a board blindfolded.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
 with MikeF on the reverse and the questionable areas on the obverse. As to a specific number I would need to see it in hand. It looks like a weak strike on the obverse and that is why it looks as if it is worn. I also do not know what is going on in the field to the right and on the rock below the drapery near the foot. The reverse wing looks like iroon and not a scratch.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
definitely a weak obverse strike but AU58/MS63 who knows  in any case I dont like the difference between the two sides.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-58, really a knockout. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1448 Posts |
I can see where people are going 58. I think it is 64 tops though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1023 Posts |
This ones actually graded as a 64. I will have to carefully look at the obverse when it arrives. Perhaps a little over graded? I think its pretty enough to stick in the collection though. I will decide if its worth keeping when I Have it in hand.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
I think it's a great coin. If you don't want it, I sure will take it!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
This coin is the poster child for the difficulty in grading from images. Apparently, with the coin raw and in hand, PCGS saw disturbances in the toning, not rub on the coin. Nice piece! 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 1,882 |
Page 2 of 2
|