| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,468 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
ms64+. some chatter in cheek and field above eagle. nicely struck.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
Left obverse field is hard to see. In hand photos will help. About MS-63 or 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5676 Posts |
MS-63, maybe 64, but large portions of the surface on both obverse and reverse are washed out and overexposed, so it's impossible to tell what's hiding in there.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The 1881-S is well known for great strike and eye appeal. Depending on what you paid for it,you should be able to find a real nice one at a decent price. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
64, guessing it doesn't look quite as well in hand.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 64 and I'm thinking those photos are tilted to enhance appeal. The easiest high grade Morgan.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
MS63+ maybe 64. Hard to tell what's hiding in the shadow. One thing about this seller's auctions is he has quite a following and many coins hammer a bit steep for raw in my opinion. It's not uncommon to find bidder histories at 100% for this seller.
|
|
Valued Member
240 Posts |
It's hard to see with the lighting, but I think that vertical slash will limit it to MS-64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36841 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I would think MS-64 from those pictures.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
484 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
hit in cheek is deeper than I expected but still looks ms64 to me. nice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5676 Posts |
Fields look nice, but I still think MS-63 because of the cheek.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,468 |
Page 2 of 2
|