| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,544 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not a big premium, but definitely worth keeping.  to the CCF! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7292 Posts |
Considering the condition it's not worth much, but I would keep it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
Definitely worth keeping in my book.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
. Technically not a low SN, But I would keep it. John1  |
|
New Member
 United States
14 Posts |
Thanks for the responses. Yes, I'll put this with my keepers.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12845 Posts |
Hey, congrats! Nice find.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
700 Posts |
The numbers themselves might be small but with a suffix of N is it really a "low serial number"?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Many (not all) collectors do not consider the block letters a part of a "fancy" serial number's appeal.
|
|
Moderator
United States
189340 Posts |
Very nice! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Nice find. I'd be keeping it if I found it in the wild.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
800 Posts |
Quote:
The numbers themselves might be small but with a suffix of N is it really a "low serial number"? I'm at a loss on this one. Is there something that I'm not seeing?  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think this was a reference to the fact that, in truth, this note was printed far into the production run based on the block letters.
Edited by Coinfrog
07/26/2021 9:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
Most people don't really take into account the block numbers with regards to low serial numbers. I'm in that camp. For instance, consider these notes, they have low serial numbers but high "series" numbers so they were not early prints for 1862, but early for the given series. I would consider them low serial numbers. I think, but am not sure, series numbers back then were the rough equivalent of block numbers today.  Edited by jimbucks
07/26/2021 10:11 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
447 Posts |
nice find! Keeper in my book!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,544 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/25/2021 7:49 pm
