| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,050 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Definitely damage, probably deliberate.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I have to agree, no rim on obverse equals post mint damage, most likely intentional from the looks of it. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
1974-1982 cent. (going by the location of the FG)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97441 Posts |
wow, somebody really put that coin to task.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1204 Posts |
Looks like they were trying to make a button out of it. LOL.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
Reverse blockage without die cap ?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
 Here's an example taken from 2022 Cent error guide book Stan Mcdonald I don't see the rim here I think That's why it's reverse
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10044 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97441 Posts |
Quote: Here's an example taken from 2022 Nice!! A future error coin.. Time travel is real 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
877 Posts |
Wow. Give someone a break Dearborn. I interpret this to say that Pennybyj is referencing the 2022 edition of this publication. Just as there is a 2022 edition of Red Book. Did you reference the material before your reply? Clearly not making a future prediction in reply to the OP question. Maybe this should be clarified before making a funny at someone else's exspence. IMHO.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Does it look like a capped die?    Note the rim on a capped die. It is saucer like, instead of round like normal. On this coin there is not hint of a rim? It was removed from the coin. How do we know it was removed? The reverse has a rim. So the obverse did have one, until it was removed. This is coin damage, not a mint error.
Edited by coop 09/23/2021 9:03 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
First to clearly here the isbn and also It's not funny you quoting a time machine You also should do more research on Brokaw so I give you reference furthmorethis could be a double strike as the Example shows there alot of examples so never give up and Only the mint knows got fries with that  http://www.error-ref.com/first-strike-brockages/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
A typical counterbrockage/clashed cap strike. The counterbrockage elements include much of Lincoln's bust (e.g., his coat and ear), the numbers "19", and the letters "BER". These were generated by the original incuse design on the working face of the die cap, elements that were not obliterated by the clash. The incuse, mirror-image Memorial design elements are sharp, normal-sized, and undistorted, indicating that this coin was struck immediately after the cap clashed with the reverse die. The largely featureless swelling on the right side of the obverse face of this Lincoln Cent represents an area of the cap that was indented by a planchet that intruded into the striking chamber.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,050 |
Page 2 of 2
|