| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,033 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
891 Posts |
From what I have read the reverse of 1977 was used into 1982. So I think that is the reverse of 1977 as you have labeled. The steps where made thicker than the 1971 reverse. After 1979 master hub wear and die wear started to show on the coins as worn lettering and orange peel effect. In 1982 the only change that I have read was that the steps were modified to be sharper. This was used until 1987 when the reverse was re-engraved.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10284 Posts |
Wow, Thanks so much Yank! Is this information in a book or on the net?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
891 Posts |
A Guide Book of Buffalo and Jefferson nickels is where I read it out of. It very well could be on the net I don't know.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
It is covered in the Breen Encylopedia http://www. >> Report This Post Staff Please << 0com/page_longacres-trimes_267.html
Edited by Conder101 01/19/2009 12:32 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
It's surprising that there has never been much interest in these.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Philly type I doesn't proof quite elusive especially in high grades.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
834 Posts |
You can also find info on the 1982 and info on full step nickels in the Jefferson nickel Analyst by Bernard A. Nagengast a must have book for searching full step nickels. Bruce.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
Great Observation, Wheezy! As you know I look through a TON of nickels, but never noticed this at all. If you look at the two photos that you provided, it seems clear to me that the lower right serif of the final A in America is to the right of the porch of Monticello on the Reverse of 77, but is aligned with the edge of the porch on the Reverse of 82. This would counter the Mint's contention that only the steps were strengthened
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10284 Posts |
How nice of all of you to comment. I just have to pick up a copy of that Jefferson nickel Analyst by Bernard A. Nagengast. I've seen it many times for sale, and I should remember that every book I ever bought did pay for itself in the past.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1882 Posts |
Quote: As you know I look through a TON of nickels Speaking of that, did you ever find the 1950-D? Inquiring minds want to know. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
Currently at 7600 rolls; still no 50D!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
"it seems clear to me that the lower right serif of the final A in America is to the right of the porch of Monticello on the Reverse of 77, but is aligned with the edge of the porch on the Reverse of 82. This would counter the Mint's contention that only the steps were strengthened."
Hawkeye. Great observation. It makes a good PUP (pickup point).
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Edited by cladking 01/18/2009 12:54 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
Wheezy, what an interesting post! After reading this I pulled out my Nagengast book and read about the design changes. You are right. Among other changes, the letters were moved farther away from the rim on the reverse of 1982. I never knew this. Thanks! But that's not all! According to the book, the same is true for the obverse. Among other design strengthening changes, the letters were again moved farther away from the rim on the obverse of 1982. Wheezy, check out your obverses also!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
"Wheezy, what an interesting post! After reading this I pulled out my Nagengast book and read about the design changes. You are right. Among other changes, the letters were moved farther away from the rim on the reverse of 1982. I never knew this. Thanks! But that's not all! According to the book, the same is true for the obverse. Among other design strengthening changes, the letters were again moved farther away from the rim on the obverse of 1982. Wheezy, check out your obverses also!"
This means a mule is possible.
These aren't uncommon on moderns and probably (usually) occur at the beginning of the year when a technician gets confused and fails to change one of the dies (normally reverse).
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
417 Posts |
I was reading in Breen's online encyclopedia last night, and there are 4 different varieties he catalogged as per the 1982 issues
-Obverse 1981, Reverse 1982 -Type of 1981 -Obverse 1982, Reverse 1981 -Type of 1982
This goes for both mints. The same type of varieties are listed for 1972 issues (with 1970/1971 obv/rev hubs of course).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10284 Posts |
It would really be something to find a 1971 with a 1970 reverse. And the value of a 1970 D with a 1971 6 step reverse would be absolutely through the roof as this is a very difficult nickel to find with 4 or more steps. Now these would be VERY OBVIOUS to detect too. I never saw one myself, Although, I don't run across many 1971 nickels either. I've seen a good number of 1970 D 1970 S and 1971 D nickels.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,033 |
Page 2 of 2
|