To participate in the forum you must log in or register.Author |
Replies: 78 / Views: 7,348 |
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Taylor's plan was to send a press to Australia and set up a private mint. Was it; was it really?
That is not what the indenture of 1853 says.
Scaife Indenture 25 June 1853.
This Indenture made the twentyfifth day of June One thousand eight hundred and fifty three Between Thomas Hodgkin of Bedford Square in the County of Middlesex M.D. Peter Tindall the younger of Gracechurch Street in the City of London Ship Broker and William Joseph Taylor of Little (Queen) Street in the said County of Middlesex Medallist and Die Sinker of the one part and Reginald Scaife of Bedford Square aforesaid Merchant of the other part. Whereas the said Reginald Scaife is about to sail to Australia in order to settle himself there as a Merchant And whereas the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor are the owners of a stamping press and apparatus for the purpose of assaying and stamping gold and other metals together with dies for stamping the said gold into pieces of specific weight which have been prepared by Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor have proposed to the said Reginald Scaife that he should establish and carry on in Australia the business of purchasing Gold and Gold dust there and smelting and stamping the same by means of said stamping press and apparatus and Dies into pieces of Gold of certain specific weights and then purchasing other Gold and Gold dust by the barter of exchange of those pieces of stamped Gold for other unstamped Gold and Gold dust. And also of associating with such business the stamping of and dealing in other metals for stamping purpose only if the occasion should require And whereas the said Reginald Scaife has agreed to such proposal and also agreed to hire of the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor the sole and exclusive use of the said stamping press Apparatus and dies for the use of his said business during the term of ten years of commerce on the expiration of two calendar months after the arrival of the said Reginald Scaife in to Australia at and under the certain rent and other payments stipulations and provisoes and conditions hereinafter contained. And whereas in part pursuance of the said agreement the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor have shipped on board the ship Kangaroo the said stamping press and apparatus deliverable to the said Reginald Scaife and have also furnished the said Reginald Scaife with the said dies for the purpose of said Business. And also shall and will from time to time as and when the said dies or any of them shall be worn out or injured so as to be incapable of beneficial use during the said term on request for that purpose furnish and supply other sufficient similar dies of the same rate and quality And also shall not nor will henceforth until the expiration of said term of Ten years determinable as aforesaid furnish any stamping press dies or other apparatus for stamping Gold to any person resident in Australia or for use in that Colony And shall not nor will henceforth and until the expiration of such term of Ten years be directly or indirectly concerned in any similar or other establishments for stamping gold in Australia. the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor their respective executors administrators and assigns as and by way of certain rent for use of the said stamping press apparatus and dies the yearly rent or sum of Thirty Pounds in each and every year during the said term of ten years determinable as hereinafter is mentioned such rent to commence on the expiration of two calendar months after the arrival of said Reginald Scaife in Australia and to be payable and paid by four equal quarterly payments in every year the first of such said rent to be payable and paid without any deduction for rates taxes or otherwise (whatsoever) and by remittance to this country in cash Gold or approved Bills on parties resident in this Country. And also shall and will in respect of every year during the said term determinable as hereinafter mentioned pay the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor in addition to the said yearly rent and by way of seigniorage a further compensation for the use of the said stamping press apparatus and dies a sum equal to two third parts of the amount by which the profits gained in the year by the said Reginald Scaife in his said business of assaying smelting stamping and dealing in Gold and other metal shall exceed the sum of Two hundred. And also shall and will engage and employ William Brown of Ewell in the County of Surrey Engineer a party nominated and approved of the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor and in whom they place much trust and confidence as manager and superintendent of the said stamping press and apparatus during the said term and not remove the said William Brown except in case of absolute necessity without previously communicating his intention so to do to the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor and having their sanction thereto. And also that the said Reginald Scaife shall and will Assiduously and diligently exert himself in carrying on the said business of assaying smelting stamping and dealing in gold and other metals in each year aforesaid and push the same to as advantageous an extent as possible and so as to stamp as many pieces of gold and other metals in each year as may be advantageously done. and inasmuch as the said Reginald Scaife must be necessarily entrusted with dies to replace those in use when worn out or impaired by use the said Reginald Scaife his executors or administrators shall not nor will give out other dies without calling in and defacing the dies so worn out and impaired which dies are to be forthwith returned to the said Thomas Hodgkin Peter Tindall and William Joseph Taylor their respective executors administrators or assigns in this country And also that the said Reginald Scaife shall and will keep proper books of account and enter therein all purchases of gold and gold dust made by him and the number weight quantity and price of all gold and gold dust when smelted into gold and stamped into pieces of specific weight as aforesaid and exchanged for other gold or gold dust and so from time to time during the said term whenever the same shall happen And shall also keep like accounts of the other metals to be stamped with the said dies... Provided nevertheless that in case the said Reginald Scaife shall die before the expiration of the said period of ten years Then and thenceforth the said rent and seigniorage or further compensation shall immediately cease and determine And the said stamping press and apparatus and all dies then in the possession of the said Reginald Scaife shall be forthwith delivered to the said William Brown.
Thomas Hodgkin, William Joseph Taylor, Peter Tindall Jr, Reginald Scaife.
Edited by billenben 02/17/2023 8:29 pm
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Fresh Kangaroo Office re-strike item at s 97. A lead re-strike of an unimportant round from Reginald Scaife's failed store OR A lead re-strike of a Taylor pattern coin from Taylor's failed attempt to establish a mint. Nothing like a false narrative to give importance (and value) to the unimportant.  At Noble in 2008 
Edited by billenben 02/20/2023 4:03 pm
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
 While looking at the old catalogue for the Stokes re-strike of the previous post I thought I would look through the other Kangaroo Office items on offer at that sale. Eye catching is the lot of 8 pieces that are re-strikes. Of those eight uniface pieces two are of the two ounce round, i.e. the obverse and reverse. Now it gets interesting because what is absent on the 2 ounce obverse is the common defect we see on the 2 ounce examples at the British Museum and at the Smithsonian. See earlier posts on page 2 of those rounds and note the 'mark' beneath the H in Phillip. They both have it and it appears to be identical on both.  Maybe it is just the photo but this 2008 re-strike offering does not appear to have that mark. We know there are more pieces than the legend leads us to believe and we have the original die. Perhaps the Museum pieces are both re-strikes by Taylor from spare dies he had. This helps us understand why W.M. Brown is swanning around London in 1862 with the only full set of the the rounds, apart from one other in Melbourne (if we believe him). It is not unrealistic to believe the two Museum pieces are not from the Kangaroo Office. The 2 oz die from the Kangaroo Office (as found on the Victoria Museum website) 
Edited by billenben 02/21/2023 02:02 am
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
The full list from 2008. I do like the token as nothing says Kangaroo Office like the actual advertising token; I like it but not $5k like it. 
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
This is quite a curious piece and likely unique but seriously; how is it any different to some of what Gee did? Just grab some dies and start pressing. 
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Description:Stokes re-strike in copper using the dies for the one ounce gold bullion round from Reginald Scaife's 1854 failed gold business that formed part of the colonial goods store known as the Kangaroo Office in Melbourne. Not so desirable when it is put in perspective. It got passed in this morning with an opening asking bid of $7500. Personally I feel it is worth about 10% of that. Its future is being a piece that someone can use to showcase how a false narrative can permeate numismatics and make the almost worthless an apex item. 
Edited by billenben 03/02/2023 02:32 am
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
In a post above I compare two known examples of a 2oz with an official re-strike. I used the 1oz picture in that comparison so of course it is missing the mark below the H. This is the official 2oz and it seems to be missing the mark under the H. Not the best picture. I would like to see the missing Dixson piece because it still appears the two Museum pieces look like they are likely Taylor re-strikes from London.  
Edited by billenben 03/02/2023 03:40 am
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
The recent Roxby copper re-strike (see earlier post) when it was at Wynyard. Sold out at $9500 but could not manage $7500 to open at Roxby and was passed in. 
Edited by billenben 03/06/2023 3:32 pm
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Australian Coin Review is back and it seems there is some Port Phillip Office Controversy. Why does the British Museum, in 1864, want a set of rounds nobody has had any interest since their manufacture in 1854? How does a bullion round go from something nobody wanted to near apex coin? I believe it is a two part article. https://imperialcoins.com.au/collec...CeOb6eO6miY=
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
This what is reported in the Argus as the cargo coming off the Kangaroo in 1853 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/...98743/510562You will notice a lot of it is supplies for third parties. The money in the Kangaroo venture was in the logistics. I currently believe that logistics is what drove the venture. People wonder how didn't they know the gold business was a bust even before they left; why even leave? Because it wasn't about the gold business, the gold business was just one aspect of the store and it has been held up as the hero of the story but it makes the investors look like idiots. They aren't idiots; it wasn't about the gold profit for the investors. That was Scaife's business. October 25.—Kangaroo, from London : 39 cases wine, 1 pipe do., 30 cases sugar, 150 cases brandy, 8 do. wine, 1022 deals, 75 cases oil stores, 6 trunks boots, 20 cases carpentery, 1 case clocks, 4 do. cordials, 39 do. raspberry vinegar, 25 do. jams, 150 boxes, 213 cases, 15 bales, 8 bundles, E. Westby and Co. ; 110 cases merchandise, 3 cases boots, 3 cases musical instruments, 400 casks beer, Clive Brothers and Co. ; 34 do, H. J. Shaw ; 3 cases pistols and rifles, G. Nicholson ; 1 do. hats, Budge Brothers ; 6 quarter-casks wine, 30 octaves do. C. D. Haffenden ; 2 cases boots and shoes, Isaacs and Co. ; 17 cases cheese, 8 tierces hams, 18 cases, J. Taylor ; 12 cases furniture, &c., Young and Spiers ; 6 packages, Budge Brothers ; 1 case, Wool- ley and Robinson ; 10 cases, 6 bales, J. Wade ; 200 boxes raisins, 5 chests liquorice, 10 packages almonds, 20 boxes do., 50 barrels sugar, 10 hhds. do., 189 cases geneva, 27 casks currants, 20 barrels do., 25 barrels raisins, 13 casks nuts, 16 cases haberdashery, 24 packages do., 61 packages, 10 cases, 4 bales merchandise, 1 bale brown paper, Heape and Grice ; 4 cases, Brown Brothers ; 1 case, Crombie, Clapperton and Co. ; 23 cases provisions, T. Taylor ; 16 bags, 56 cases, 25 casks, 2 tierces merchandise, 1 case saddlery, 163 boxes sugar, 100 cases wine, 125 cases beer, 223 cases spitits, J. Purvis ; 104 cases do., 32 casks do., A. Wilson ; 1 case cutlery, Joseph and Hill ; 2 cases pistols, 2 cases boots, 24 casks brandy, 100 casks rum, 6 cases, Lane and Wilks ; 15 cases sardines, Swan- ston, Willis, and Co. ; 2 cases, J. Haman ; 5 barrels tobacco, 4 cases cigars, B. Pike ; 2 cases French plums, 2 cases, 12 trunks merchandise, 5 cases tartaric acid, 7 hhds. nuts, Wilshire and Leighton ; 25 hhds. brandy, Graham, Lamb and Co. ; 4 cases, 3 casks, 1 bale, Smith and Kirk ; 4 cases perfumed spirits, J. Wade ; 1 case do., J. Hanam ; 2 cases pistols, O. Neushauss ; 1 cask lamps, N. H. Hart ; 1 case cutlery, C. Kent ; 1 trunk stationery, D. Sitkis ; 6 cases potatoes, Young and Spiers ; 1 cask, 5 cases, 5 packages, W. C. Graves ; 2 cases, R. Green ; 5 casks, T. Adeer ; 87 cases, Willis, Merry, and Co. ; 3 cases, J. Allans ; 3 cases, 240 kegs, W. Powell ; 3 cases, 6 trunks, J. Wade ; 2 cases, W. Mayo ; 8 cases, 5 casks, 17 bales, T. Andrew ; 58 cases, 4 tierces, H. J. Rudwell ; 3 cases, 1 trunk, Isaacs and Phillipson ; 2 casks, J. W. Harriott ; 1 case, M. Knows- ley ; 2 casks, T. Jackson ; 10 casks, Smith and Kirk ; 89 firkins, 6 casks, W. R. Merry ; 7 cases, J. Orr and Co. ; 9 packages, T. Lewis ; 12 cases wooden houses, 1 case hats, 2 casks earthenware, 1 case stationery, 194 cases cheese, 3 bales woollens, 3 cases furniture, 5 do. scales, 1 case arms, 9 cases spirits, 149 do. geneva, 6 trunks laths, 1 bale ironmongery, 1 package paper- hanging, 12 boxes, 29 barrels, 30 packages, 19 bales, 447 cases, Order.
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Since my first post on the Kangaroo Office back in Nov 2022 some points have changed as I have researched the matter but the fundamental view the numismatic narrative is rubbish has not change and the premise these pieces only exist on the numismatic radar after Vaux in 1864 still stands. Having read the through the whole thread there are a few things I would change. The gold price when Scaife is set up to press is one of those things. London Times Sep. 8 1851 p. 7 col. The only doubt I have is as to the quality of gold which may be found in any given spot - whether the Australian broth is as thick as that of California. The quality of Australian gold is superior; it fetches 3s.to 4s. per ounce more than California in the Sydney market. London Times Jan. 13 1853 p. 5 col. Victorian gold is fine and pure.N.S.W. gold sells at £3.7.6 oz.Victorian field at Mt. Alexander, Bendigo and Ballarat yield at £3.10.9 even at Sydney. The W Roth blurb on the History of Australian Coinage from 1895 that I mention in earlier posts claims the Messrs, in late '52 or early '53 become aware gold is going for 55s. It doesn't matter where one looks they are going to see that the price is 68s-70s; not 55s. The thing I would change is the gold price as Scaife is ready to start pressing in 1854. Gold price late 1852 The gold price as reported in The Argus 1st of the month 1852 Sept 1 67.5s Oct 1 - 67.5s Nov 1 - 68.5s Dec 1 - 69.5s Jan (1853) - 70s https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/88631/507910Almost 6 months before the Kangaroo sails gold is 70s per ounce. Price ends up around 76s the day after the Kangaroo arrives in 1853. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/98607/510527Six months later the 1854 price is April 26 -79s May 26 - 79.5s June 26 - 80s July 26 - 80s Aug - 80s https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/4795808As Scaife opens for business the price is at the London price (80s). This is problematic because there is nothing to be made from making the bullion sets but as we have seen, in the Argus 15 Sept 1854, sets have been made. A year later as Scaife prepares to 'shutdown' the press in 1855 Apr 3 - 76s May 3 - 75s June 6 - 75.5s July 4 - 76.5s Aug 24 - 76.3 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/4816206On the 27th of Aug the press is advertised in the Argus for sale. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/...hTerm=scaifeScaife opens the Kangaroo Office in 1854 as gold peaks leaving no margin and to further complicate things the colony is awash with sovereigns so there isn't even a need for gold in bullion round form. The Port Phillip pieces are just expensive mementos of the exhibition should someone want to buy a set. William Morgan Brown claims 27 sets were made, Scaife, in a letter home dated 9th Sept 1854, talks of two sets to be sent home to be forwarded to the Paris 1855 Exhibition should the Hodgkin's wish to do so. Even though the gold price is at a peak in 1854, numerous sets are made. I would finish this gold assessment by reminding people that in the Roth 1895 account it claims the rounds did not proceed because gold was 84s. Bollocks it was ever that much. The 55s is not accurate and the 84s is not accurate; Roth is not reliable and he claims he talked to Scaife. Perhaps Scaife is not that reliable 40 years after the fact. The '55s' is a story that seems to have its origins with Scaife. Having put that in order I would move to the idea Hodgkin is the key partner of the Messrs. Hodgkin may not be as key as is Tindall. Hodgkin would be onboard for a venture to assist a budding colony that has associated with it establishing his son in law and wife in the colony. Sharples of the Museum of Victoria seems to like this 'the store is the hero of the story' theory and it has much more merit than the waffle about 55s gold that makes the Messrs look like geese. As they say "follow the money". The money is in logistics at around £3 per ton to ship things from London to Port Phillip. Global shipping rates almost double from 1851 to 1854 and I now feel that in late 1852 Tindall builds a boat for the Australia run and it is a Tindall who talks Hodgkin and Taylor into being investors in this, can't lose, logistics venture and from that follows the store and the press. Add the store and the press and we have all the pieces and reasons why these 3 end up in bed together. The idea the venture was about chasing a gold margin is not how Hodgkin rolls and it makes the investor look like idiots because that plan is gone before the boat even sails. Do not forget Taylor can just ship his stuff at £3 per ton anytime he likes and in the Argus of late '52 there is plenty of spaces to let that would facilitate his dream. Taylor doesn't need a £13000 venture to make it happen. The idea it was about a colonial goods store with a press out the back has merit but the real money, after looking at shipping rates through the period, is in shipping. I am just flicking through the Argus from 1853 to 1859 and I see reports on the shipping rate. I know the Kangaroo is good for about 600 tons of goodies. It occurs to me that is around £2000 with passengers fares for a one way trip. A return run should easily net over £2000 after expenses. The Kangaroo would have only cost in the order of £9-11k to build based on the £ per ton cost to build a ship in the late '50s. The Kangaroo is back in Adelaide on Dec of '54. It seems it can make the return trip in just over 14 months and note that it sits in the harbour for close to two months when it does come to Australia as it gets a back load and books passengers for the return run. The clipper pays for itself in about 7 years and then it is all free money and the boat is a capital investment that would be depreciating but still have some value. From a financial perspective logistics is why Messrs buy a boat to sail to Australia. Smart Messrs do not buy a boat to ship a token press to a place where they know the gold margin isn't great and where there is no call for the bullion product they allegedly hope to peddle. John Sharples of the Museum of Victoria speculated they go, go, go because they do not know the colony is over stocked with colonial good. The store should be fine. I think an even better premise as to why they proceed is the numbers relating to logistics. Follow the money. The success, or lack of success, of Scaife's gold business and the store are the least of the ventures concerns.
Edited by billenben 03/09/2023 03:08 am
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
There is a rather well researched article on the Kangaroo Office from Andrew Crellin (of Sterling Currency) written in 2008. Even though that article references work from J Sharples on at least 3 occasions it is unfortunate that article is written without the advantage of Sharples article from 2005 and the Indenture Deed in that 2005 work, although I am not sure it would have made a lot of difference.
WJ Taylor's Kangaroo Office & Patterns of 1855 And 1860 by A Crellin It opens with the words: "William Joseph Taylor was a British entrepreneur active in the numismatic manufacturing industry in London in the late 19th century."
William Joseph Taylor are literally the opening words, up on the pedestal from the get go and the hero of the article.
The article goes on: "Taylor saw an opportunity (in early 1852) to earn a profit by converting the abundant gold into small ingots or tokens that could be used in daily business."
This is interesting because the early 1852 news of cheap gold is typically late 1852 with most commentators and the early 1852 claim is unreferenced. According to Roth who spoke to Scaife - "At the end of 1852 or the beginning of 1853 news reached the old country that Ballarat gold was selling on the field for £2 15s per ounce."
Gold in the Argus 5th of August 1851 is quotes at 66 - 67s. If London has news of the gold price then it would be from 3-4 months or so prior to 'early '52", say from about July / August '51. Even at that point in time the generally published price was not even in the post code of 55s.
Crellin's cites Roth but not in relation to when the 55s gold price is acknowledged, it seems Roth's timeline is ignored by Crellin even though Roth's dates come from Scaife. Anyway; as we know Taylor signs away most of the 'opportunity' and becomes a 1/3rd owner and just a 2/9th beneficiary of any profit.
The article goes on: "Taylor and two business partners financed the proposed enterprise to the sum of around £13,000, and a 600-ton clipper named the Kangaroo was purchased to transport the minting equipment to Melbourne and also continue to transport emigrants and supplies between London and Melbourne after the initial journey."
Here is where we see the numismatic goggles kick in and it was a similar handicap for Sharples as well. Right here the penny drops. Taylor never needed to be part of a venture to take the 'opportunity' he allegedly saw. Numismatic goggles polarize the matter and no one is looking at the other partners and what their motives might be and what is in it for them. I saw motive for Hodgkin but it was looking at Tindall that revealed shipping rates was where the financial driver was and where the real money was.
The articles goes on: "The primary competitive advantage that Taylor had anticipated his Kangaroo Office would enjoy . " "Despite the massive setback that the change in the prevailing gold price had upon Taylor's plans .." "It says much for Taylor's perseverance .."
The problem here is Crellin's has not seen the Scaife Indenture. It is not Taylor's Kangaroo Office. If it is anyone's it is more likely Hodgkin's doing the philanthropist thing. In the Crellin article Taylor is the protagonist yet we now know he is just a 1/3rd part owner of the press and a minor beneficiary of any profits and that this is in effect Scaife's business.
Taylor's perseverance is more a case of Taylor obliviously pressing things because he can. It is all well and truly over for currency opportunities in Australia when Taylor is pressing patterns for shillings and six pences. There is nothing on offer for Taylor, there is plenty of sovereigns, plenty of small change, a Mint in Sydney, so either Taylor does not know this (living in a bubble) or he is just pressing because he likes pressing, even if it is unrealistically speculative what he is pressing. At the end of the day Taylor knows he can flog off just about anything to the likes of Montague who loves a speculative pressing and by doing so his name goes up in lights so to speak.
The article goes on: "It would appear that after all possibilities that the production of gold, silver and copper token production had been exhausted by Scaife and Taylor, and as no further commercial uses for the machinery could be conceived by 1857, Taylor and his partners in London finally chose to cut their losses and close the Kangaroo Office."
It could equally say " that after making 27 sets and selling none it was obvious nobody wanted expensive bullion rounds."
The idea they were cutting their losses is strange because the press was bought for scrap price. There was not a lot of investment in the "gold business". The Exhibition went well and token sales were good until Scaife struggled to get blanks so overall it wasn't a great loss.
What transpired with the store can be somewhat followed in the Argus from 1854 to 1855. Scaife in April 1855 tells an Industrial Society meeting that he must renege on a job as the press is to be shipped home. The plan changes and the press is advertised for sale in the Argus in August of that year.
Scaife is bored and annoyed with the shop as early as mid 1854, as his letters reveal he is trying to dispose of the lease. By September 1855 Scaife is working in the insurance business as the local media, the Argus, sees advertisements with his name on a regular basis.
The Crellin's piece has the standard numismatic "all about Taylor" vibe. It is at odds with a number of other pieces on various finer points. In places it makes key assertions with no reference or reason the view expressed can be implied.
In some cases the Crellin's piece is the more likely or more accurate account than some others but the Crellin's piece falls down as it, from the get go, puts a halo on Taylor and Crellin's has not seen the Indenture; but I think that would not have made too much difference to his article.
Edited by billenben 03/10/2023 01:55 am
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
Coinworks on Kangaroo Office pieces
The coins struck at Melbourne's 'Kangaroo Office' in the 1850s have been owned by some of the greatest collectors of our time; Montague, King Farouk of Egypt, J J Pitman and Quartermaster to name but a few.
(COMMENT: And these famous collectors all only showed interest after the 1864 Vaux elevation of the pieces from mementos of the Exhibition to pattern coins for national coinage. If Vaux says nothing then how much interest do such collectors have in bullion rounds from a failed store in Melbourne in 1854?)
The Kangaroo Office was a bold plan by English entrepreneurs to establish Australia's first privately run Mint. The planning phase began in London, in 1853. Coining operations commenced in Melbourne in May 1854. Three years on, after substantial losses, the mint was closed. While the plan had all the hallmarks of a farce, it left an important legacy for today's collectors and historians.
(COMMENT: If this was the plan then why did the 3 Messrs lease the press to a third party and sign away 1/3rd of the profits leaving each as a minority beneficiary? The Mint, actually an exhibition screw press, 'closed' early April 1855, i.e. less than one year after opening. The claim of substantial losses is unqualified)
William Joseph Taylor was an Englishman, and by trade an engraver and die sinker, active in the numismatic industry producing both coins and medals. He was an entrepreneur. And a shrewd businessman. Towards the end of 1852 Taylor became aware that gold could be bought from diggers on the Ballarat fields at greatly reduced prices. His plan was to establish a private mint in Melbourne, strike gold coins and release them at their full value in London. To thwart currency laws, the designs were made to look more like weights than coins. Taylor himself cut the dies for a 2oz, 1oz, 1/2oz and ¼oz gold piece, each dated 1853.
(COMMENT: The "end of 1852" claim seems to have its origin in Roth's 1895 piece in the Queenslander and at that time, end of '52, as well are all sick of hearing, the gold price was stable around 70s. The old "his plan" allegation goes down in flames once one reads the Indenture where we see "his plan" turned out to be to become a 1/3rd owner of a leased press and a 2/9th beneficiary should the gold business go well)
Taylor formed a syndicate with two colleagues, Messrs Hodgkin and Tyndall: the three investing £13,000 in the enterprise. They chartered a fully rigged 600 ton vessel to transport the coining press, the dies and two employees, Reginald Scaife (manager) and William Morgan Brown (assistant).
(COMMENT: who formed a syndicate with who seems to be highly debatable? I seriously doubt Taylor came up with the Kangaroo venture and the Kangaroo Office is all about Hodgkin's son in law. Taylor seems to be the least likely to have been the ideas man behind the venture. For £13,000 they buy, not charter, the Kangaroo)
The vessel was aptly named 'The Kangaroo', then, as now, a symbol of Australia. Taylor's mint was known as the Kangaroo Office and was situated near Melbourne's Flagstaff Gardens in what is now Franklin Street West. 'The Kangaroo' arrived at Hobsons Bay on 23rd October 1853, and the huge coining press was deposited on the wharf. And there it sat. Unfortunately, it was too heavy to transport. The only option was to take it apart and move it, piece-by-piece, to the Kangaroo Office, where it was reassembled and put into working order.
(COMMENT: According to the Argus, who had their finger on the pulse of daily "Shipping Intelligence", the Kangaroo arrives on the 25th. In previous posts there are pictures of this "too heavy" press and I leave it to the reader to judge the movability of it. If it sits on the wharf then it is most likely because it has no where to go. An 1850's pre fab store is not like a modern throw tent. It takes time to find a site and assemble. It takes extra time in a town where most able men have run off to the diggings.)
The Kangaroo Office eventually commenced operations in May 1854.
(COMMENT: Most likely June/July according to Sharples)
The coins were struck in gold and featured a heavy broad engine-turned rim with a squatting kangaroo facing right and in sunken letters on the rim the words PORT PHILLIP AND AUSTRALIA. The reverse depicted the weight of each piece in figures with the words PURE AUSTRALIAN GOLD above and the weight in letters embedded into the rim. Again the emphasis was on the weight rather than a value so as not to be construed as a 'coin'.
(COMMENT: Not a coin and also not a token by standard definitions. A bullion round or medal are the most apt descriptions)
The Kangaroo Office operated for three years striking examples from the original dies, although how many of each is unknown.
(COMMENT: Actually the press was out of action by early April 1855 and Scaife at that point thinks it is being shipped home.)
We do know that William Morgan sold a complete set of the four kangaroo patterns to the British Museum and was said to have informed the museum staff that a total of 27 sets were struck, of which all but one had been melted down. Reginald Scaife also told Sydney numismatist Dr Walter Roth that only one set had been issued in Melbourne. This set was displayed at the 1854 Melbourne Exhibition but what happened to it after that is unknown.
......
Taylor operated his Kangaroo Office for three years during which time he sustained substantial losses. With all hope of a profit gone, the dispirited promoters in London issued instructions for the Kangaroo Office to be closed.
(COMMENT: "His Kangaroo Office" ... "he sustained" ?" It wasn't "his Kangaroo Office " and his investment in the Office itself was likely rather small. The narrative has all the trademarks of the usual Taylor this, Taylor that, narrative that was completely debunked in 2005 by Sharples who found the Indenture of Scaife.)
Edited by billenben 03/11/2023 4:38 pm
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
The Argus 26 Oct 1853 Shipping Intelligence - Arrivals October 25. - Kangaroo, ship, 600 tons, Christopher Pickering, from London 26th June, Cape Town 17th September. Passengers - cabin : Mr. and Mrs. Scaife, Mrs. Wetherhill, Mrs. Croger, Miss Bird, and Messrs. Bell, Black, Stratton, Withridge, Poppleton, Cox, Thomson, James, Stevens, and Master Ellis. Dr. Depus, surgeon. Henty and co., agents. Where is Taylor's man, the engineer, the mischievous Mr William Morgan Brown? Some commentary has Brown on the Kangaroo; if he is then he is not listed. Also the Museum of Victoria and 'coins and australia' both claim: "Scaife's wife and child were on board with him on the 'Kangaroo'". Trouble is Scaife has no children at this point in time according to the genealogy sites. First child is Ethel Maude Scaife born 1854 in Melbourne. We are not just missing a Messr (Brown) but we are missing a non existent child as well. Do note the date of arrival. Not the 23rd (Coinworks and Sterling) or the 24th or the 26th ( Perth Mint and Museum of Victoria) or the 27th (dealer listing for a '54 token from the Exhibition). People seem to be parroting wrong information. Am I the only person who reads the newspaper? I like holding up W Roth as a source of material that just gets parroted. Roth spoke to Scaife and Roth reports in his 1895 article in relation to the Kangaroo: "She arrived in Hobson's Bay on October 23rd 1853. Messrs Scaife and Morgan Brown, the later now deceased, were sent out as managers. " How the numismatic narrative hasn't been questioned and disassembled in the past seems quite remiss of some of the more 'senior' numismatists. Sharples debunks the whole Taylor myth in 2005 and Trove goes online in late 2009 so why are we here in 2023 with a numismatic "Taylor-centric" narrative that is just rubbish?
Edited by billenben 03/12/2023 7:17 pm
|
Valued Member
 Australia
134 Posts |
|
|
Replies: 78 / Views: 7,348 |
|
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2025 Coin Community Forums |
It took 0.63 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
|
|