| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,152 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
You can't call them a nickel because they don't contain any nickel 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
Isn't " War Nickel" like saying "fool's gold" or something like that? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
The composition of War Nickels (42-45) was changed to redirect critical materials (primarily Nickel) for the war-effort. Silver "War" nickels were produced by the United States from mid-1942* through 1945. The coins were manufactured from 56% copper, 35% silver and 9% manganese. This allowed the saved nickel metal to be shifted to industrial production of miltary supplies during World War II.
Silver nickels are distinguised by a slightly different coloration than ordinary nickels and by the appearance of a large mintmark above Monticello's dome on the reverse side of the coin. The marks are "S" for the San Fransico mint, "D" for the Denver mint and "P' to indicate production at the Philadelphia mint, being the first coin to feature the Philadelphia intial, as no mint mark was the usual designation for Philadelphia mintage before 1979. * Note that some 1942 nickels were produced without silver content. These will have a small "D" or "S" mint mark to the right of Monticello on the reverse or in the case of Philadelphia minted coins, no mint mark at all.
http://warnickels.com/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
OH BROTHER ![/b] ...  .....This sounds [b]REDICULOUSLY close to the "Penny" vs. "Cent" arguement !!...... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2049 Posts |
I would buy them since they are below melt. Down the road, this could be a huge bargain as silver goes up in value, and there is none to be found.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
Quote:The composition of War Nickels (42-45) was changed to redirect critical materials (primarily Nickel) for the war-effort. Exactly! They have no nickel in them!  Quote: OH BROTHER ! ........This sounds REDICULOUSLY close to the "Penny" vs. "Cent" arguement ! And just like that, this is all in fun! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1000 Posts |
Quote: OH BROTHER ! ........This sounds REDICULOUSLY close to the "Penny" vs. "Cent" argument !...... It may be borderline Koala vs Koala Bear argument. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
193 Posts |
Quote: OH BROTHER ! ........This sounds REDICULOUSLY close to the "Penny" vs. "Cent" arguement !...... Fanning the flames.... cent dime (from latin decima tenth part) Quarter (dollar) fifty cents, half dollar since nickel refers to the composition of the coin and there are 3 cent nickles, would lead me to call it a 5 cent piece
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189142 Posts |
Quote: Koala vs Koala Bear argument. Now that was a fun conversation! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts |
Further fanning the flames...
I always thought the root of the word dime was not decima, rather disme from Simon Stevin's paper 'De Thiende'. But I haven't read extensively on the subject and can definitely be wrong.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
595 Posts |
Quote:The composition of War Nickels (42-45) was changed to redirect critical materials (primarily Nickel) for the war-effort I read somewhere that it might actually have been prompted more for the propaganda than by a need to save nickel for armour. Anybody know anything about that? Jan
Edited by janknez 03/07/2009 11:34 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
193 Posts |
Quote: I read somewhere that it might actually have been prompted more for the propaganda than by a need to save nickel for armour. Don't know about propaganda, but the silver replacement was chosen so that the general composition would not effect existing coin operated machinery i.e. telephones and vending machines. When's the last time you saw a telephone booth? BTW, $25 a roll is a good price
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3294 Posts |
Edited by nod2003 03/07/2009 2:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3294 Posts |
oh yeah, one of the quarters was a 1932
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
581 Posts |
You probably paid too much. Long and short is that the silver in War Nickels will be much more costly to "extract" than the silver in 90% silver coins. That may be to the composition or the fact that there are far fewer War Nickels than 90% silver coins. My advice. Avoid like the Bubonic Plague. They are only valuable if the silver can be extracted easily. Imagine. Your local bank going up in smoke. Wouldn't have thought it possible..... Imagine the DOW below 7000..... Wouldn't have thought it possible..... Imagine..... I'm not trying to be difficult here. War Nickels have ALWAYS been cheap if you figure out how much silver is in each coin or roll. The point is that if it ever got down to actually melting them for the silver, it would require an entire different process and it would inevitably be more costly. So DO NOT look at War Nickels and figure out their silver content and bid accordingly because they will NEVER have the same value as 90& silver coins such as the Walkers or Barbers. By the Way, that's also why 40% silver, various world silver and other silver proof coins go for "less" than others. When the smelters are melting, they don't like goofy and unusual things.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,152 |
Page 2 of 2
|