| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,529 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2873 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1479 Posts |
yes the reverse shows 2 slight scratches- in hand not as distracting my android amplifies them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7651 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1521 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
G4 for me, large sections of rim worn off on both sides. Agree that it's a tough coin unless you want to spend. Trivia - 1903-S was an odd year for the reverse design type. Yours is Reverse 2 "thin ribbon" (the right ribbon end), which was replaced in 1901 by Reverse 3 "thick ribbon." Yet for 1903-S the old thin ribbon reverse was used on a large majority of the SF coins, and the "correct" thick ribbon reverse is scarce.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15572 Posts |
I'll go G6 on this one.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18729 Posts |
I'm going with G6 also, due to the grade I think they probably put it in a straight holder
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1479 Posts |
I think NGC got this one wrong by a full grade. Though there appears to be reverse rim weakness in pics if coin is slightly canted in hand full definitive reverse rims are discernible with no fields worn into rim. The obverse has rims of a G-6 but missing the magic L and a portion of I for a slider G-6 i.m.o. The hairline scratches are old and subdued and barely show under a 10x loop in hand. Perhaps the grader used a magnifier screen with heavy illum and zeroed in on those scratches Who knows? Thought this coin would highlight the subjectivity of grading. Thanks for input. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
I think you'd have to see a hint of inner ear detail and a bit more leaf vein on the reverse to get to G6. I agree that AG3 is a grade too low.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18729 Posts |
another under graded coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1792 Posts |
I think this one was net graded due to the scratches. I have no problem with AG-3 (the reverse rim is missing on 40% of the reverse).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
Looks G-4 to me. Might have gotten "details" for the scratches.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6399 Posts |
Good-4 for detail. With the scratches and weak reverse rim I can see NGC giving it an AG-3 as a no-problem net grade.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,529 |
Page 2 of 2
|