| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,209 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5405 Posts |
Close up of the mm area . Looks like a removed O ?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: Looks like a removed O ? Or an extremely worn S
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7124 Posts |
Mind might be playing trick on me (after reading Pacificoin post)
But I do see an O there.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Damaged and heavily worn. G+ detail. Would have to be authenticated as a P.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
882 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1521 Posts |
A Good - Details coin. It doesn't look too suspicious to me, but you never know. Worth sending in for authentication.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
I agree with Frog, can't be sure if there was a mint mark there based on these photos. Maybe some of the VAM experts can ID it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5689 Posts |
I'd say G details. Not convinced there's a removed mint mark—it seems it would have had to be in circulation for many years afterwards to have it blend in that well. Might just be Pareidolia. Probably worth having it attributed by a TPG with an in hand evaluation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
I see the only potential issue that could detail this coin are the rim dings. 50/50 shot at details, although I see a chance at a straight Good-4.
The mintmark area looks entirely natural.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18738 Posts |
I'm not seeing signs that a MM was removed. I don't condone slabbing a coin however if this was mine I would heavily lean getting it authenticated and protected. if it come back straight you have a winner. G4 straight imo. the coin looks like an old cleaning but there is a chance due to its rarity that they may pass it  my only big concern is the rev rim at K9 it almost looks like a repair. if it is it probably would not grade straight. hard to tell with these photos. when you blow it up it looks much more reflective and silverish. small rim hit obv K12 but I don't think that would knock it
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Can't disagree with that.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
This piece has a lot going on besides the rim problems. There's been a steel punch used on it at 3:00 obverse leaving a circular (hole) with displaced metal.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
882 Posts |
Holy Moly, perhaps a diamond in the rough. I have yet to send a coin for grading. Not sure but I think I have a membership @ NGC. I know PCGS brings the highest resale value but they seem to be over rated IMO. Alot of inconsistencies and discrepancies lately. There are about six other coins I've set aside for grading Being my first submission it could be a spell before I can get an update out. Much thanks for the advice and feedback here. My knowledge has increased exponentially as a member of this fine community. I'll be back to you all later on this one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18738 Posts |
if you have others to send in just make sure the values warrant it. i'd post them here for comments first. PCGS offers vouchers at the higher level subscriptions so that can help with costs but its still expensive.
for this one I would not use anyone other than PCGS or NGC. just my opinion
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,209 |
Page 2 of 2
|