| Author |
 Replies: 31 / Views: 4,725 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
343 Posts |
@Silverskunk a VAM is a specific die variety, distinguished from other varieties by subtle differences in the design. A strike through is considered a "Mint Error", that is a defect in the coin that occurred during the minting process. The reason I sent it to PCGS was both to verify the nature of the damage (whether it's an actual strike through or post-mint damage) as well as to have it preserved as it would be one of the more significant strike through errors I've seen on a Morgan. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5802 Posts |
Quote:
... the Reverse has a Main strike through, I noticed it's raised in appearance... A strikethrough is incuse. My perception gets "inverted" sometimes where an incuse area on a coin will look raised, but I'm confident these areas are incuse. In general, a strikethrough is foreign matter that has gotten between one of the dies and the planchet. That will leave an incuse (recessed) impression of the object. There is the chance this was damage to the planchet before the strike. This is still a nice error, whatever it turns out to be. Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
Edited by Petespockets55
04/29/2025 06:50 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
765 Posts |
Quote:
I have to agree with Hondo. One nice strike through, and a lot of scrapes. Even if I already didn't respect Hondo's observations already in my short time here I'd have to agree with him on this even with my untrained eye. The scrapes just seem so obvious and jagged, the last set of pictures removed any doubt. Check me off with Hondo on this one. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
765 Posts |
Quote:@Silverskunk a VAM is a specific die variety, distinguished from other varieties by subtle differences in the design. A strike through is considered a "Mint Error", that is a defect in the coin that occurred during the minting process. The reason I sent it to PCGS was both to verify the nature of the damage (whether it's an actual strike through or post-mint damage) as well as to have it preserved as it would be one of the more significant strike through errors I've seen on a Morgan. I thank you for taking the time to explain. I had already taught myself a bit about the subject. Enough to at least make an observation. Again many thanks. Lovely coin BTW. Enjoy. Edited by Silverskunk
04/29/2025 5:28 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
Very interesting coin.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
 This is a great photo. The angle and lighting clearly show a frosted incuse texture, which is exactly what to look for in strikethroughs of softer material. A scrape would smear and smooth the metal, reflecting light in a different way. This photo shows obvious untouched frost maintained from the striking process. Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
25731 Posts |
Quote:
The angle and lighting clearly show a frosted incuse texture, which is exactly what to look for in strikethroughs of softer material. This is also what a scrape would look like - surface metal removed revealing the underlying silver. Also, this particular "strike through" would have to been in three separate pieces ( CA, *, A ), which is very unlikely. The top of the R is also damaged, but not from a strike through. If a TPG judges this as strike through, I will meekly eat my words. But until then I am convinced that this part of the coin is gouged. Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Well, she's back from grading. Hondo, I hope you're hungry:    A few observations: I'm disappointed that they didn't note multiple strikethrough errors on the label. That said, I have to believe that if the smaller ones were scrapes/gouges that the coin would have received a Details grade. I'm even more disappointed that they didn't mount it Reverse-side up as I politely requested (and they've done for me before). All in all, still mostly pleased with the result. Thanks to everyone for your opinions and insight, as always they are truly appreciated. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
75319 Posts |
Congratulations!   Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
United States
190135 Posts |
Quote:
Well, she's back from grading. Hondo, I hope you're hungry: Excellent! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
Well done, nice result!!
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
Awesome results !
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5802 Posts |
Congrats on the designation/attribution. One other thing I didn't mention about why I saw this as a strikethrough was because I saw no pressure ridges (like when a field is plowed) that occur with scrapes and PSD. Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
Edited by Petespockets55
06/21/2025 10:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Thanks @Petespockets55, that will be very helpful next time I find a potential strikethrough.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2287 Posts |
Great result, curious what kind of value this would bring.
You realize when you know how to think, it empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,725 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 04/29/2025 06:42 am
