| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 878 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1193 Posts |
Thank you, Errers! Agreed, I'm not positive what it is  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
828 Posts |
I'm going with G04 because of the rims all showing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
Full rims and date is full...what I insisted upon as a minimum when building my set.  How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10595 Posts |
Another at G04. The date is close to being full.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15476 Posts |
I can agree with G04 range.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Marv65, nickelsearcher, thank you both!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
Enough rim there for a G-4.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
tough call that this coin would grade straight. all the horizontal swipe marks and the coins overall appearance are pointing to a cleaning.
G details (cleaned)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
That reverse is really strong for a G-04. I agree with G-04 as the technical underlying grade here, but the reverse rim is about all that holds the reverse back from G-06. The obverse is weaker.
Yes on the old cleaning, so G-04 Details sounds right.
Pretty good snag for a melt value purchase.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
Panzaldi, fortcollins, thank you both very much!
Noted on the cleaning, I'd figured as much, but still very happy to grab this one.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
I commend you for starting this set. Walkers are well-designed coins, and are readily identifiable and collectible all the way to AG-03. Other series didn't fare as well in circulation, such as the Buffs and SLQs. Not all detailed coins are equal. Your instincts are sound. I'd take a "details - cleaned" coin any day over a bent, holed, filed, or graffiti-covered coin. Keep going. You will have a collection that is well worth the time. And in the process, you will be assembling a grading set that you can use for other Walkers. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1193 Posts |
fortcollins, as always, much appreciated!
Walkers are definitely a favorite of mine, and agreed about cleaned versus "damaged".
I'm hoping that bin hasn't left yet when I go back, there was a similar 1928-S and an AU or UNC 1946 I had to leave behind... Just didn't have the cash on me.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 878 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/31/2025 7:30 pm
