| Author |
Replies: 47 / Views: 3,818 |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3098 Posts |
Quote: If copper values ever increase to that point, then no copper majority coin is safe! Then what would we use? Tin? Zinc? Lead? Al?  Chocolate? 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Electrons! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3294 Posts |
I like the idea of chocolate backed currency.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
with a chocolate backed currency I will be doomed to stay in the poor house
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
eaglefoot <<<<<< investing in " Hershey's Inc." tomorrow morning..... 
|
|
New Member
United States
43 Posts |
Quote: We got off of the gold standard for a good reason. The value of our economy was growing much faster than the amount of gold available to back it up. There is a lot of room for semantical confusion here. I was about to state that we went off the gold standard in 1933 when the economy was shrinking, so that we could "grow" the economy, but dollars were still convertible to gold (by foreign nations) until 1971 via the Bretton-Woods Agreement, which was reached in 1944. And some call the 1971 action by President Nixon as "closing the gold window" rather than "going off the gold standard". Anyway, if the dollar was still pegged to the gold at $20.67 per ounce I could make the argument that the economy wouldn't have grown. I guess I can also say that the economy hasn't really "grown", and that what we have instead are more dollars. Cheese Louise, I think I'll have an easier time understanding quantum physics than trying to straighten this out. Quote: I am not saying what replaced it is better. On paper, the Federal Reserve is a better system. In practice, well, you see what we have going on now. Interesting choice of words...."on paper". I don't think you were intending a pun here either. On paper it is a better system, and it's ironic that the system is run "on paper".
Edited by Desert Rat Dave 06/24/2009 2:35 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Quote: Interesting choice of words...."on paper". I don't think you were intending a pun here either. On paper it is a better system, and it's ironic that the system is run "on paper". I actually thought of that when I wrote it and almost added "no pun intended" in parentheses, but wanted to see how people reacted. I am glad someone else thought of it as well! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
183 Posts |
Just my USD $0.02.... I think that the mint turns out way way too much of this crap. Heck they have enough quality control problems as it is with their USELESS one dollar coins. Wow, the Ike, then the SBA, then the sac, now these issues... bleh :p These Presidential dollars are just junk souvenirs that are legal tender. Now heres my idea. We take all paper dollar notes out of circulation. We mint a coin, copper like the old cents, about the same size and dimensions as the late Gold dollars. Geez we could even recycle the design - and then problem solved, the BEP saves the government 18 million USD/year+. Remember in Canada they had a huge backlash when they took 1$ notes away, the "loonies" were so popular that now the 2$ coins are minted too. *ahem*.... Brass Quarter Eagle, anyone?  Bruce
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
During one of the numerous discussions on this I said that the high mintage and current inaction is actually building the supply so that the switch could be made without any shortages of the dollar denomination. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Quote: wd1040: Then what would we use? Tin? Zinc? Lead? Al? Chocolate? I'm partial to 95% Aluminum with 5% Nickel as a strength additive. The 5% Nickel would provide a distinctive electronic metal 'signature' for vending machine use (to prevent the use of aluminum-only slugs). We cold have anodized "golden" coins that would stay gold colored and not tarnish. We could also have other colors of coins. Denominations could in fact be color-coded. The light weight of the coins would also have obvious appeal for carrying in your pocket or purse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Quote: jbuck: If copper values ever increase to that point (beyond 'face value'), then no copper majority coin is safe! Actually, millions of copper-majority coins will be 'safe', but those will be the coins that were already considered 'collectible' before the price of copper passes face value. No one's going to be melting Proof Golden Dollars or Clad Proof Quarters in year 2100 or so, but billions of circulated copper coins will be going to the 'goo factory'  ...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
I agree with you, but I was thinking of the "uniformed" people; the same people that cash-in their inherited or stolen collections. They would have no problem melting down those proofs.  I do believe you are correct in that the meltdown will raise the value of the survivors.
Edited by jbuck 06/25/2009 10:40 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
hi-jack sort of when will Ikes be considered classics?
i am heading to the coin shop today to sort through 2 coffee cans of ikes he has
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187446 Posts |
Eisenhower dollars are already classics, at least in my book they are! Let us know what you find!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
will do he told me he doesn't search for varieties just pays face and dumps em in the coffee can
|
|
|
Replies: 47 / Views: 3,818 |
|