Help Identify Some Ancient Coins | Assorted Roman

I cant help you with the 7th - but could do with another couple of pics of the last one if you want to get your microscope out?

Its prob Constantine or one of the similar name/date emperors but could be an Arcadius.

I have uploaded the new pictures. Also should this coin be cleaned any more. I rather like the sand colored dirt(wouldn't rely call it a patina). Looks pretty nice. However should I clean up the text a little?
Also, for coin Number 2? I just dont see it.

Again thanks for helping me out with these?

Cool - looking at the pics now - much better.

I would say leave your coin as it is - I'm not anti-cleaning but in this case you may loose the ability of reading the text.

It happened to me with a Carausius I had - It looked similar to yours but I gave it a light rinse before putting a bit of wax on it and found to my horror the text was then unreadable! The same day I sat on my only other Carausius and snapped it!

I'm now a lot more careful what I clean - and where I sit - lols.

What is it on 2 you dont see? The link or the 'VBLI'?

OK I got the last one - I'll take you through what I did as it could help you in the future with your 50!.

Firstly - look at the bust, the style of this one is 'laureate' (the wreath on his head), 'draped' (clothing on his shoulders) and 'cuirassed' (Amour - cant really see it but I think its there on the centre of his chest'.

The bust can help date the coin to a period though not exclusively - For example the above is very common with Constantine and the emperors around him in date. Likewise if the the Bust had a 'radiate' (Spikey crown) then it is prob from 215 - end of the 3rd century. It helps cut down the names we are looking for.

This is not an exact science as there will be many coins that 'break the rule' but is a good start.

So looking closer at the text on yours one we can see 'CONSTAN' quite clearly - it helps as we already know it to be of the Constantine era as it means we look for certain letters in the text - it seems to help them stand out.

Unfortunately there are a lot of Constan...'s (Constantine I, II and II, Constantius I and II and Constans!).

The best thing to do here is start with Constantine I - he was on the throne for 30 (307-337) years and is far more common than the rest due to the number of coins produced under him.

Pop over to Wildwinds.com and search his coins with thumbnails (you need to click at the top where it asks about this):

http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/constantine/t.html

Straight away we see the resemblance of the bust - use the thumbnails on the right to look for something that resembles the reverse of your coin. Luckily we dont have to go far - the 9th one down looks very close:

http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/cons..._vII_058.jpg

Compare the text on the two and we can see it fits on the Legend where there is a gap in it CONSTANTI---NVS MAX AVG. It also matches on the Reverse with the gaps GLOR---IA EXERC---ITVS.

Cool - we got our match.

If it doesn't fit you just have to keep going till you find one that does - sometimes you can guess the missing letter by fitting them to Legends that are known, also the number of missing letters can help you remove emperors from the ones you are searching - eg if the name would be too long or short to fit.

Sorry if I've gone over stuff you know but it was easier to write from start to finish and I'm sure some of it was helpful.

CONSTANTI-NVS MAX AVG, rosette-diadem, draped, cuirassed bust right GLOR-IA EXERC-ITVS, two soldiers holding spears and shields with two standards between them.

I'll post something about the mint mark in a minute.

I see what you mean - sometimes its the just differences between the mints or even the change of stamps at the same mint - below is the same coin (leg, rev) as yours but you can see he has a much thinner face than the earlier one posted.

http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/...RIC_012c.jpg

Sometimes there are big differences in the appearance of the same coins over time and distance and also on certain coins like the Constantine above there are other even more confusing differences.

This Constantine type (http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/cons..._vII_058.jpg) can have 1 or 2 standards in the middle. The design of the standards can differ slightly and also the item/character at the top of the standard can be different. Just to make matters worse the standard can have 1, 2 or 3 dots/pellets on the top of it! Add to that the number of mints and the odd included unofficial minters mark and you can end up with hundreds of iterations of the same coin! On a perfect coin you can identify some of these marks and attempt to nail your coin down to a recognised recorded one but on a worn coin its too hard. Sometime you just have to be happy with the Leg and Rev.

thanks. I was trying to get a better shot of the reverse, but wasn't able to come even close, so here is a link to the original image. It has higher resolution then the flikr

http://i49.tinypic.com/4ig048.jpg

I am thinking maybe this?
http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/bigp...an_II/i.html

or

http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/bigp...an_II/i.html