1983-D Penny Error?

Between the M and E in america, I see something.

lftbolol, While better pictures are nice it would be helpful if you communicated with us in words what you see as the errors on this coin.

The mintmark is the result of a split in the copper plating on the coin that corroded subsequent to the strike. This caused the zinc core to expand causing the doubled appearance.

The 'thing' on the reverse of the coin is a gas bubble which was essentially caused by the same thing as the mintmark problem, except in this case there was an impurity on the zinc core when it was plated in copper. The impurity corroded completely underneath the copper causing the zinc expansion, which resulted in a gas bubble. Some coins have one, some have hundreds of them.

Neither of these occurrences are considered errors, and neither bring any premium value to the coin. In fact, they are more common that cleanly produced high quality cents from 1982 through 1989. Some of the techniques used were changed between 1990 and 1992, after which finding such horrid quality is more a rarity than a common thing.

On topic, I hope the forum will examine the next example by a newbie!! Does this D look rotated and is it an error?

Thanks Copper! Had my hopes up!LOL!

Here's another one. It seems to have an extra rim or something.

Twslisa: The die die wear. It starts on the tops of the devices, then flows towards the rim. No premium for this though.

It is best to create your own thread with your coin. Why? Because the information might be wanted to look up. The search engine would not find this. So your own thread is better to do. (you don't eant to hi-jack someone else's thread)