| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,700 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
the scratch marks were the things that made me believed that they were polished/cleaned, but of course, it could have been slid across a table, rubbed on pants, kicked, etc. but the way that they are made lead me to believe that they are polished marks. I don't know what it is, but I believe it is polished/cleaned
Edited by Adam_E 04/09/2010 10:38 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
Edited by nwc coin 04/09/2010 10:52 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1534 Posts |
A polished and/or a cleaned coin will have a very bright, unoriginal looking surface. Original luster is a sure sign that a coin has not been cleaned, although a cleaned coin can have small remnants of luster. The first coin I am almost positive has not been cleaned, the lighting is most likely making the obverse look too bright. The second coin may have been lightly cleaned, but as I mentioned above, the luster is a sign that the coin is original.
By the way, I'll say VF-20 for the first quarter and AU-55 for the second.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
VF on the first The second I would need better pics
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
New pictures a little further up - two responses while I was editing my post.
I got the first one for $19.50 and the second one for $99.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2150 Posts |
Now thw second one looks to be in the xf-au range. Lost some luster with the second pic!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1534 Posts |
I stick with both my assessments, but the 76-CC has a larger probability of being cleaned now. You got a fairly good deal on the first, and a pretty good deal on the second, although I will waited for the Seated experts to chime in. Two quick suggestions though: perhaps you should consider investing in a nice camera, the one I use can be bought for around $100 on ebay and here are two pictures I've taken with it, without a tripod or copy stand:  Also, if you are a fairly new collector or haven't been collecting these too long, I suggest you look at numerous examples, to get a better grip on cleaned and problem free coins. Both are very attractive though. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I believe the 1876cc is a counterfeit. The date does not look right at all, the digits are different heights. Maybe there is a different variety, but all of the ones I looked at on coinfacts have the digits even. Hopefully I'm wrong, but you should try to post some better pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
I am concerned about the same thing as Johnny. If you could get us some pics similar to your second photos of your 1854 that would be helpful.
Edited by JimR 04/10/2010 08:54 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
I see what Johnny 54321 is saying but it could be the pictures. (?) I would need to see better ones to make a judgment. But the first pictures of the 1876 CC quarter shows a LOT of shininess you don't usually get with a fake Chinese coin... So there's hope for an authentic (but maybe polished ?) CC quarter... 
Edited by Moe145 04/10/2010 12:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
Edited by nwc coin 04/10/2010 3:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
Pretty heavy cleaning on the second one - by the parallel scrub marks. The cleaner didn't pay much attention to the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
516 Posts |
Do the new pictures still look like it could be counterfeit?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
to me, definitely, the date does not look right, mostly because of the black areas look like solder marks and the digits are different heights. JMHO
i wonder what others think...
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
The date in the last picture looks much closer to me. Sections of the numbers in the first picture seemed hidden which made the date look crooked, but the new pictures look pretty close; so it appear that I may have been wrong(thank God). I'm not saying for sure it is genuine, just that it doesn't appear counterfeit to me anymore. Thanks for posting the latest shot as a good picture can mean all the difference in the world.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,700 |
Page 2 of 2
|