| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 4,096 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
that's a nice looking coin, I am not godd at grading these but I would agree EF
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
I'm going for EF-45 with environmental damage. Nice coin though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1582 Posts |
biokemist6, An 1870 S Half Dime? Wouldn't that be a "unique" experience?  Ralph |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1582 Posts |
bherring1964, Not a problem with you checking out the auction on ebay; however, I think when a person does that, they are cheating themselves in that they are often influenced by the sellers info rather than honing their grading skills here in the forum, and I believe that is what this forum is about. Now, with that said, I will move along to your next point - I don't believe there is such a thing as net grade anymore, is there? I believe I read somewhere right here on Coin Community Forum that the major TPGs will no longer assign a net grade to a coin. If I remember correctly, the TPG will assign a grade, and make a notation on the insert as to what problems are associated with the coin. As to the price, I would have loved to get this coin for $400. but it seems that, invariably, there is always a sniper lurking in the bushes who tries to steal the coin in the last few seconds. But, then, I guess thats just part of the ebay experience. Anyway, snipers aside, the cost was actually less than $600. with free shipping. Return it? I can't think of a reason in the world why I would. This is the first 1870 S I've seen on ebay since I started putting my circulated set of Seated Liberty dimes together last year. It's just one of those coins you don't see all that often, and, frankly, I'm happy to have it. I would point out that I collect coins because I truly enjoy collecting coins. I don't concern myself with resale value because I have no intention of selling my collection. This is my accomplishment, and it will be passed on in time, and, hopefully, be enjoyed by the next generation. Ralph |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Ralph,
Sorry if I offended you. Will not comment on your threads in the future.
Edited by BH1964
08/06/2010 9:13 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16681 Posts |
I agree with AU50, weak strike especially reverse, possible corrosion albeit light.
BTW, I personally never believed in "net" grading. Unless horribly corroded, the coin has a grade, and a problem associated with it.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Edited by vermontensium
08/06/2010 9:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1582 Posts |
bherring1964, your post did not offend me in any way. I was merely answering your post in what I felt was the best way I know how. Please feel free to critique any and all coins I post. You are entitled to your opinion just the same as every other member of the forum family. Afterall, grading a coin is really nothing more than an individual's opinion of what he/she thinks the coin will grade. Granted, there are some alot better at it than others...I belong to the latter group, so I read, and appreciate all comments on the coins I post. Thank you for resaponding to my post.
Ralph
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1582 Posts |
Prethen, I can't comment on the luster, yet. Just bought it last night, and got a message this morning informing me that it had been mailed. Should get it sometime early next week - I'll get back to you then.
Ralph
|
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
Ralph, that is truly a great coin. My first impression on grade was a weak strike, but insufficient detail on the reverse leaves to get it to EF 45. I like EF40 myself. Also, I think your assessment is correct on "net grading". I don't think the TPG's do that anymore deferring instead to either the PCGS "genuine" tag or a "details" grade that is non-specific as to assigning any kind of number. Super buy - my $.02  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
As long as the coin is genuine, you did fine with the purchase imo. Looking at past heritage auctions, that was in the ballpark of a problem free VF certified example. This is an extremely TOUGH coin, are you going to send it in?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1582 Posts |
No Johnny54321, I'm not real big on sending coins off to have them graded. I might have a different opinion if I were concerned about value, but, as I stated in an earlier post, I collect coins for the sheer enjoment I get from the hobby. This one will go into the album with the rest of the circulated Seated Liberty dimes I've been able to put together on my way to completing a set (don't know if that's a realistic goal or not - some of the ones I don't have cost a scad of money...when you can find them). Ralph |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
My suggestion for sending it in would be to confirm authenticity more than establishing value. An added mintmark is also a possibility given the huge value difference between the 1870 and 1870-s dime. I'm not saying it looks fake, I'd just want to be sure when spending that much. Anyways, nice coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1582 Posts |
I can certainly appreciate where you're coming from there. It'd be a bummer to have an 1870 with an added mint mark...I've got a 20X glass on hand to view it when it arrives - if I don't feel right about it, the seller has a 7 day return policy.....just have to wait until it gets here.
Ralph
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
I would adree with EF details
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
Definitely AU details, look at the head detail and the corn kernels on the back. It doesn't have much wear, but is a weak strike. These can be tough and you have to look at those as indicators of wear often instead of overall detail.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 4,096 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/06/2010 5:56 pm
