| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 9,166 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
 not an error, the date has been damaged by a counting/rolling machine |
|
New Member
 United States
2 Posts |
If this is damage from a coin counter, it must have been done a long time ago, because the damaged area blends very well and it has been out of circulation for at least 12 years. I may take it to a coin dealer with my 1909 S VDB that I am selling to see if he has an opinion. Out of the 3.7 billion of this coin punched, you would expect some errors I would think, but I found none documented.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
I don't think this is an error. It was a hit after it was made- post-mint damage. It could have happened early in the life of the coin, though. No premium, it's worth 1 cent or maybe a little more.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Being out of circulation for 12 years is irrelevant, this coin had the previous 25 years to be damaged. BTW, I am not offering an opinion, I am making a statement of fact- this coin is definitely damaged. This type of damage is quite common and affects the outer digit of the date, I have seen dozens of them from various years posted here in the past five years.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
robplano I agree with others assessment of this being a damaged coin. Dont take this the wrong way but, We have all been there at one point in time when we have held something thinking its an error when in fact its not. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
1943 Posts |
Welcome to the forum Robplano! I also agree with PMD (post mint damage). We see this type of damage alot on here. The end coins on the shotgun style rolls that complanies like Brinks and Dunbar send to banks sometimes get this damage. If you take this to a coin dealer be sure the dealer is familiar with error coins. Alot of dealers are not but will still give an answer instead of admitting their lack of experiance. Again welcome and we look forward to more posts from you. |
|
Valued Member
United States
314 Posts |
 I concur that this is PMD even to the extent that every time I see one of these, I put it back into circulation. Well, actually that's not true since I am now holding on to all of my copper cents prior to 1982. However, all of the 1982 and after go back into circulation. P.S. I have encountered hundreds like this. Welcome to the forum. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2540 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
When the damaged digit/mint mark show the parallel damage to the rim, it is coin wrapper damage. Probably happened the first time the coin was wrapped.
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
Looks like this coin went back into circulation . Found in Texas about two years ago . Thought I found a true mint error . Ha .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
Edited by cwb
01/02/2017 1:09 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Or the coin could have been damaged with a vending machine. The distortion is almost parallel to the rim of the coin. So I'm leaning also to coin damage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2189 Posts |
Another current thread of another Lincoln Cent with the exact same damage  |
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
If this is post mint damage...i have the *identical* twin to it. If you look at my coin, it is pristine in the area of the 3. It's too clean to be damage in my humble opinion. And now that I've seen another penny with the exact condition, I dunno... there's got to be something to it. Mine had even LESS of an outline of where the 3 should be. It's very clean
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
Metalmazed, post images in a new topic. Always happy to see new ones. Thanks, Doug. Edited by Halo1st
07/15/2017 6:44 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 9,166 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 08/12/2010 5:30 pm
