| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,589 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I appreciate the kind words, Bryan, but Rob Joyce is, personally, the reason 1921 Morgans are becoming a popular niche, and I'm a newbie, an amateur, and second-tier at best. Modesty aside, here's my take on the coin after closer examination and thought: 1) A planchet defect of some sort. Unlikely because the cheek strike would have flattened it. 2) Some other pre- or post- mint happenstance. Honestly, I think this is the most likely explanation. The area to the right of the marks bears closer examination - there looks to be incuse cuts in there. I could believe that some strong, edged object striking the coin obliquely from the 3:00 direction could cause metal to be raised in that fashion. 3) A heretofore-unfound extreme die break, the attribution of which will rearrange the hierarchy of 1921-D VAM importance.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
954 Posts |
Post mint damage. I can see a dark line on the right side of the raised metal, that's got to be a cut.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
772 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Becky
Post mint damage. I can see a dark line on the right side of the raised metal, that's got to be a cut.
I don't think it can be certain just from these pictures. The dark line also caught my eye, but could be a shadow. But like the others said, if it is a die-variety, this will be quite a find. Please be sure to keep us updated with any info you find out. To the experts, if there was a flawed planchet with those marks, would it look like that after being struck? Raised and all? Although I am by no means an expert, all the flawed planchets I have seen have been gouges and not raised.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
772 Posts |
... because if that was a planchet flaw, wouldnt that have been flattened out if they were once raised, or filled if gouged? The planchet flaws I am familiar with are always in the field, since that does not get struck with anything, I have yet to see one on the depiction because of that reason
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
604 Posts |
I have the best name for this new variety The Bear Slashed variety
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
756 Posts |
Hmm, I have 2 1921-D morgans, should I be looking at these things carefully?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
jdheyne that is what would make this thing so unique, because it would flatten out with each strike so there would be very few and I mean very few with these marks because as you said they would flatten out a considerable amount with each strike
wrk4lvg, allot of people collect 1921-D Morgans since the release of "Fun with 21" came out, and considering there are so many varieties available for the 1921 series there are some big names actively searching for each variety they can find and new ones are being found almost daily
Edited by Bryan1315 08/30/2006 5:10 pm
|
|
New Member
 United States
47 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Bryan1315
jdheyne that is what would make this thing so unique, because it would flatten out with each strike so there would be very few and I mean very few with these marks because as you said they would flatten out a considerable amount with each strike
wrk4lvg, allot of people collect 1921-D Morgans since the release of "Fun with 21" came out, and considering there are so many varieties available for the 1921 series there are some big names actively searching for each variety they can find and new ones are being found almost daily
I have some more closeup photos from different angles I'll post as soon as I get them uploaded to my website. They show the raised portions from the 3, 6, 9, & 12 o'clock positions.
|
|
New Member
 United States
47 Posts |
Here are the new photos. The second photo shows the area in shadow on the side closest to the ear is flat. I don't see any hint of any type of incused cut anywhere near these die gouge marks. I sent inquiries to Leroy Van Allen and Rob Joyce about this. I appreciate the help everyone. I have no idea about how to get it verified and listed as a new VAM, much less getting it certified and slabbed.   
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
WOW with those pictures I gotta say I would be emailing Leroy with a quickness
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
604 Posts |
Wow this is the reason why I want to restart on collecting morgan 21 vams this coin people this coin
hey mhburton if this coin becomes famous and if you use the bear slash name you will mention that I came up with it right?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Michael, Leroy Van Allen is still the man responsible for determining and assigning new VAM designations. VAM is still his initials, after all.  The new pics really have me thinking that Leroy needs to see this one in person.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
772 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by SuperDave
Michael, Leroy Van Allen is still the man responsible for determining and assigning new VAM designations. VAM is still his initials, after all. 
Well, two-thirds of his initials. George Mallis having the M 
|
|
New Member
 United States
47 Posts |
Well, I heard from Leroy Van Allen and it looks like this is going to have to be chalked up to post mint damage. It looks like this coin was scratched deeply and the the normal wear has rolled the raised areas over into the grooves so that it looks like a die gouge caused it. I got out into the sunlight with a better loupe and can see it as well. I should have ceen this before getting everyone all excited. Wishful thinking got the best of me.  It was fun while it lasted though. Thanks for all the input on this. Ya'll are the reason this is such a great forum. I'll just keep looking. There are lots of neat coins left lying around. Michael
Edited by mhburton 09/03/2006 08:55 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
954 Posts |
Thanks for the info. I know it wasn't what you wanted to hear, but I think this was a wonderful learning experience for everyone. Thanks so much for sharing it with us!! 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 3,589 |
Page 2 of 2
|