| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,952 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
AU-50, some wear behind the ear, bottom hair curl and ribbon. Light rub on the cheeks and bow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
If the magority is saying XF then my eyes just don"t see it. AU-55
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
I was probably a little conservative on this one.
Bottom line is, it's nice with great eye appeal.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
266 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
I've got to go.. AU-55.  Beautiful Indian Head.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
402 Posts |
Beautiful IHC gotta go with AU-55. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1348 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
I agree with AU on this one, it's a nice coin. There is some weakness in one diamond that could drop it to EF, but I think it's a weakness in strike in that area of the coin, rather than significant wear.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
One reason I wouldn't call this a choice AU is because of the spot in the head dress and the discoloration around the ear.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
689 Posts |
The spot and discoloration show much more in the pics. Thanks for everybodies input as it is much appreciated!
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
311 Posts |
Now this is a nice coin. Nice chocolate brown colour. For me I need traces on mint lustre to grade it AU55 so I will call it AU50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1659 Posts |
Very nice eye appeal.
I'd go with AU53.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
462 Posts |
I'm gonna change my grade to AU. I was over emphasizing the partially lost diamond. As I learn more about this issue I see that this is more in line with an AU piece.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I also think it is solid for AU, and my first thought was AU-55. Nice!
|
|
New Member
United States
8 Posts |
I would have to agree with macmercury the the dings set it back a couple points it has to be around AU53
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,952 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/25/2011 11:33 pm
