| Author |
Replies: 56 / Views: 5,061 |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts |
Now youre just making me angry now. You dont even collect error coins you only collect die varieties. I gave him honest info on what they usually go for around. I'm not on here to get insulted by a wanna be know it all. I'm on here like everyone else to help and learn.
Lets just drop it. The best way to learn on here is by giving opinions. You learn quicker that way. I'm a very opinionated person who at times will be wrong like everyone of us on here.
Edited by Cud Wild 03/08/2011 9:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
You're confusing me with coppercoins- I don't collect anything. I buy and sell these pieces for a living. It's my sole means of income.
Best way to learn here is by reading and understanding what pieces of information knowledgeable forum members share.
I don't learn anything by giving opinions, neither does anyone else. People learn when they come to understand fact. FACT- There is only one way that each specific error type and die variety is created. FACT- It's difficult for your words to carry weight when you go back and edit them to say something else after someone has responded to your post. (yes, I edit my posts, but for the purposes of clarity only) FACT- Some people will learn by being members here, some will be too busy sharing opinions. FACT- NONE of this should make you angry- if you were here to learn, you would (learn). You're arguing and muddying the water for those who are seeking truth and clarity on coins.
I've said my piece and am putting this baby to bed. G'night everybody!
Edited by liveandievarieties 03/08/2011 10:00 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts |
Youre boring me with your insults. Sorry about all this KOINKID I was just trying to help you out. I didnt mean for liveandievarieties to insultingly take away your post.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts |
On a side note MODERATOR delete everything from me and dievarieties on this post due to the post is about KOIN KIDS find not our argument. I feel this is insulting to his find and I apologize.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1256 Posts |
Very nice find! Peace out!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
You're confusing me with coppercoins- I don't collect anything.
He's not confusing you with me...I don't collect anything either.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It is a NICE Error! As coppercoins said, the obverse is well struck, the reverse is missing a portion that fell away after the strike. Call it a lamination error, a delamination error or a partial split planchet after the strike.
Some might argue with the last description but either of the three descriptions are good for this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
Coppertop- to answer your question, NO. There is absolutely no way that this could be damage and look the precise way that it does. I understand that to the untrained eye, it looks like a gaping hole, like a gouge. But I encourage you to go back and read the post thoroughly, it has been suggested and explained why this is not damage. Nearly all large, deep, dramatic laminations or planchet splits will have this appearance of roughness and randomness. It is one of the aspects that clearly signals the genuine article. There are tons of ways to damage a coin, but there are not tons of ways to accurately imitate this error type.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
The strike itself is probably what dislodged the chunk of planchet. What you're seeing at the top as raised metal, is the effect of the (lose upon impact) planchet piece being pushed into the other portion of the planchet.
Just as a foreign object pushed very hard will cause deep gouges, so will 2 pieces of coper under the tons per square inch pressure of a cent die press.
In less than a tiny fraction of a second, the dies compressed on the planchet that had serious structural integrity issues. As this happened, it dislodged the portion of planchet which is missing from the reverse. When said piece was dislodged, it was simultaneously pushed against the larger portion of planchet, under incredible pressure. Then coin was ejected from the dies, probably dislodging the smaller, missing portion of the planchet at the same time.
This all happened more quickly than the time it takes to blink your eye- no I'm not exaggerating.
When such things occur under intense pressure and incredible speed, the result only has one appearance. There's nothing else like it.
Think of 2 metal bars- one is bent by slowly applying pressure. The other is snapped in two, like a twig. If you look at their stress points, they will look very different, even though they were identical metal bars. The bar that was snapped will have obvious signs of QUICK and great pressure. On the bent bar, pressure was obviously applied more gradually. What I'm trying to illustrate is that under the minting process, some of the ways that metal reacts is not possible to replicate through damage. I tried to show why, I'm afraid my metaphor may fall flat.....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
And the "raised" metal that you do see- it's not raised above the level of the rim, or even close. The depth and heights are not well conveyed in a 2 dimensional image.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
958 Posts |
thanks liveanddie, I could not tell from a 2D image if the metal was rasied higher then the rim , If I had seen a pic at more angles it would appear eazier to tell, My question was what you mentioned " the metal looked higher then the rim and pushed way up " It appears in the pic to maybe/maybe not be higher then the rim and letters around it , so the loose metal was impacted by the die and made a " crater like " appearane pushing some metal outwards. I was not aware of this every lamination I seen online appears to just have pieces fallen out and a void left behind, this is the first I seen the delamination metal leave a huge " crater like impact " thats why I thought it might be PMD struck after the mint by some object that pushed the metal up. Becuase I thought even with a loose piece of delaminated metal it would still be mashed so hard and fast bythe die it would cuase the fields around the loose metal to be flat. I have also never seen one this big before , most are smaller delaminations Thanks for the info. I'm gonna have to look closer next dime I get a damaged coin and do more investigating how the damage was cuased
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
It really helps to be able to have had a few of these in hand. What one understands by studying it under a loupe, can't be impressed upon someone with digital photos, not that the photos weren't great, they were fine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Liveanddievarieties,
That was a great explanation:-) of how that coin ended up looking the way it does:-)
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1161 Posts |
All I can say is thank you for the explanations. I was uncertain and had the same questions as Coppertop about what seemed to be a build up of metal along some of the edges. Thank you for sharing the coin and the explanations. I enjoy reading the posts on this site and welcome any and all the knowledge shared. Sometimes you have to sift through the a bit of drama but the end result is always worth it. This is definitely a hobby that has a lot of passion and some times it spills out for everyone to see. As the Cent Turns...These are the coins of our lives. :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
601 Posts |
|
|
|
Replies: 56 / Views: 5,061 |
|