| Author |
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,640 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
since I like to get 90% silver, I try and get proof silver coins or bu silver coins. love the nice shiny look and kids flock to it like cat to catnip :D :D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3276 Posts |
if we were talking about proofs like that classic proof, i'd have to change my vote to "i love them"
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Quote:Scooby Due: Of course, I bought the ( State Quarter Silver Proofs) for their silver content I bet more than a few of us would have bought "uncirculated-finish" 90% silver State Quarters, had they been available.  It's interesting to note for modern commemorative Silver Dollars, the Uncirculated versions typically have lower mintages and greater secondary market value than their Proof equivalents. The 2008 Bald eagle Dollar I like better in Uncirculated, because its obverse is reminiscent of the Type I Standing Liberty quarter reverse.  The 2009 Lincoln Dollar, I like better in Proof (even though my Unc. coin is worth more!) All in all, design has the most influence as to whether I like a coin better in Proof. The year-2000 State Quarter designs are still ugly even in Silver Proof versions, which is why that Set's worth only melt.  Coins with large expanses of flat fields (ie: Wyoming Quarter, 2011 Native Dollar) tend to look great as Proofs and not so good as business strikes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3692 Posts |
Look at the 20 Pence (England) proof coin and you might change your mind. It did for me. :)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
That is a very hard question. For me I would have liked a "yes and no" option
Of course I would like to have some seated or barber proof coins .. Or some classic gold proofs.
And I think the silver parks quarters in proof are very beautiful coins
My biggest problem with modern proof coins is, long ago I put them in dansco's, like my Lincoln 8100 album. For the proof coins, if the wrong speck of dust gets on them .. it is easy to develop a spot. Also I have seen many proof coins get a milky appearance
So IMO BU coins hold up much better than proof coins.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
muddler: If THAT'S the way you like to show off, go for it!
|
|
Valued Member
Ireland
131 Posts |
Quote: Look at the 20 Pence (England) proof coin and you might change your mind. It did for me. :) I prefer the proof of the new tuppence myself...  Norm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1888 Posts |
I like proof coins esthetically but not as something to be pursued the way a key date or type is sought after. To my way of thinking, proof coins are the numismatic equivalent of a happy meals toy, or some other fancier trinket made only for collectors. They do not represent 'true' coinage or its true purpose, and as such, belong in a category unto themselves. The Nth degree of perfection is not a realistic goal for most coin hobbyists. Although I do not collect proofs per se, I must admit it's cool to find them in circulation or in the silver melt tub. That's the only way they will find their way into my albums. And fewer things in the coin realm are more irksome to my eye than a spotted proof.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
Hate 'em....hmmm...I don't think so. Read my article on Early Proofs (esp. 19th century) and you'll see why these are not to be hated. Far from it. They are essentially the quinessential...the apitome...the top dog of what a particular coin should be like. Hate this one?.... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7196 Posts |
Prethen, I really enjoyed seeing your Half Dime, stellar colors and the same date as my half!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
muddler and Prethen, those are some beautiful early proofs! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
341 Posts |
I like them but rarely get any. I just don't trust myself storing them properly for years and years. Just worried they will get spots etc... over time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3276 Posts |
i think my mind has been made up that I only care for classic early proofs. moderns just don't do anything for me, they look too perfect. at least classic ones get a certain look to them, they have beautiful designs and they get some great toning.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
114 Posts |
Some thoughts from England on this subject. Bearing in mind that Proofs are supposed to be a perfect example of the art of minting, I find them quite acceptable. However, I have some reservations about them. Proofs are usually made from specially produced dies, and therefore there are subtle differences between them and equivalent circulation issues. In this case, my choice is for the real (circulation) coin, if possible before it has had much use if it is a modern coin. British Proofs now have a frosted relief, which in itself makes them unlike circulation issues. Our Royal Mint now has an additional grade that they issue for collectors, called "Brilliant Uncirculated". This is what it says, a coin which is highly polished and only handled/packaged under controlled conditions to prevent damage. Being so bright, they do not appear natural. Perhaps the difference today is the marketing policy - sell - sell - sell. Whoever the customer might be, just get the money. Present day prices are exorbitant compared with a few years ago. Proofs used to be produced for the true numismatist; nowadays they are aimed at an unsuspecting public. As for NCLT in general, I'm not very amused as to me, quoted from the Oxford Online Dictionary, a coin is "a flat disc or piece of metal with an official stamp, used as money" - note the used as money! Now to "year sets". Unfortunately, as they are produced at the beginning of the year (and now before Christmas), they are usually incomplete. Therefore, to obtain a full set of ALL coins for a year, some have to be in individual packs. I think that, from the above, you will see that I consider sets and other specially marketed issues poor value and their distribution poorly organised.  What do we, true collectors, really want? My choice would be for, at the end of each year, a full set of all coins that entered circulation, to Uncirculated standard. Bill.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
I own proof sets from 1964 to present because I love them. To me it's a perfect example of the coins made that year, all wraped up and ready to go. I don't feel bad about not saving clad coinage (including State Quarters), Lincoln memorials, late model Jeffersons or modern dollars, because I know I have my proofs. The only modern coinage I collect outside of proofs sets are Kennedy's.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,640 |
Page 3 of 3
|