| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,027 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
Hello, I had a PRO look at this one! I'm taking his opinion, To worn for my eye's. HA HA   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1713 Posts |
Looks like the last number is 8.
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1952 Posts |
lets call it a very weak strike 1922 no D and get rick. may it will be the first one ever discovered lol. looks like a 23 to me or 29 maybe but I like the 22 idea
Gary
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
717 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
I fooled with the color and intensity a little and you can see the shape of the eight a little better. 1928 for sure...  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4589 Posts |
I also believe it to be a 1928
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1952 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
258 Posts |
Gary, You are not alone!! The PRO I told you about specilizes in die varieties. I am taking his opinion on this coin, because he think's it's a 22 with a weak D  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
 If it's a 22 weak "d", wouldn't you be able to verify with other contributing marks on the rest of the coin? This is definitely a question, not a statement. I'm just curious as I thought when you have a "special" coin, just about every known nuance is noted somewhere in someone's library... |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
717 Posts |
Try getting it certified. If they say it's a 1922 weak D (or Plain), it's worth the TPG costs. BTW, if you send to ICG & it gets body-bagged, they don't charge you (except a $5 administrative fee). http://www.icgcoin.com/Default.aspx?tabid=655 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Your PRO needs to look at the pictures here. This is either the strangest case of wishful thinking I've ever seen, or someone is just kidding us. I enhanced further. Compare it to the shots above. Of course you are entitled to spend money slabbing a really worn out 1928 if you want to.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
I very highly doubt 1922, and even at that the coin is a FR-2 (it's not even AG because the date must be readable for AG). At FR-2 anything but a key date coin is worth right around face value, and even a key date coin would be next to impossible to sell. So what's the point here? Just a guessing game nobody knows the real answer to?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
Hello, Maybe it is just a game, Just like all the no date indianhead nickel's. You wish you could see just a little more of that date! As to this coin, If there is a tiny chance that it could be a 22, Maybe I'm wrong, but my thought's are that a FR-2 22D are better than no 22d at all! Sorry if I bothered anyone with this coin!  Larry |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I think it is obviously a 192 AD coin. This was made by the early Babaloanians or Romans that forsaw the coming of Lincoln. If there is the Coloseum on the reverse, it is the Roman version.  I really don't see anything after the 2 and if it was another 2, it is way to shot to be able to be brought back. |
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,027 |
|
Posted 09/05/2007 09:35 am
lol that would be huge lol
