| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 3,432 |
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Why do you think it's an S mintmark? There is no way to know.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
A good shot of the date straight on and a close up of the letters RT in LIBERTY will tell us. There is only one obverse die used for 1893-S Morgans.
|
|
New Member
 United States
3 Posts |
it is my understanding that they used one die stamp for the 1893-S & two for the back, that by looking at the real ones for the rabbit ears On the R & T of Liberty & the date position and location all these things appear to show it to be the real deal and the only ones to have this was the S mint
|
|
New Member
United States
3 Posts |
the guy that listed it on ebay listed it as a bolo tie under jewelry instead of placing it as a 1893 Morgan silver dollar under US coins I was able to buy this for $95 and was the only bidder. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
If you have the rabbit ears you won big time.
Edited by dave700x
08/31/2015 07:32 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2233 Posts |
If the coin isn't fake then you most definitely made a good purchase. Nice job!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
it looks like a P to me because of the position of the date but the pics are really hard to see if u hade better I pics I can tell you for sure the mint mark and if its 100% authentic
|
|
Valued Member
United States
415 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It does appear to be a genuine 1893 Morgan. The auction ended 10 days ago, do you have any in-hand images to share? Also, not sure how you could have been duped when it was not being sold as anything other than a 1893 Morgan? http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-BEN...em51d5e1bea1 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4420 Posts |
IMHO, it's not a '93-S and likely not a genuine coin. To be a 93-S, there must be a dentil positioned squarely below the "1" in the date. That's not the case here. There's one that looks identical on a website that's not allowed as a link. It has a BIN of $22,000 .... By Googling "1893, dollar, bolo" (without quotation marks), one can see a few identical pieces, including one that's in a Goodwill store. Also, ebay listings contain a number of bolo ties with admittedly "reproduction" Morgan dollars. Edited by ExoGuy
08/31/2015 03:11 am
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 I know nothing about coin jewelry , why can't you take it to a reputable jeweler and have them remove the Morgan. then there will be no question. |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It's not an 1893-S. The date position is wrong.(assuming the auction link posted is the same Bolo)
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Here's a clear pic of the obverse:  All 1893-S coins are Far Date. The left serif of the 1 is more than three full denticles from the point of the neck. This coin has what's considered a Normal Date, with the serif of the 1 2-1/2 denticles from the neck. Not sure what it is, but I'm absolutely positive it isn't an 1893-S Morgan. |
|
Valued Member
204 Posts |
The date looks too thick honestly.
Why not take it out of there?
I am HOPING you scored but I am highly skeptical in all honesty.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Not a 93s. That's for sure. And the date looking thick is probably from the minor polishing it received by the person / company who made the bolo to have it sparkle when it was set in the bezel.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,432 |
Posted 08/30/2015 9:20 pm
