| Author |
Replies: 47 / Views: 3,515 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4867 Posts |
A Democratic proposal to replace the current copper-plated zinc cent with a steel coin has run afoul of the Bush administration. The Mint director voiced objections to two key provisions in legislation before the House. There is more to the article but you have to subscribe to Coin World. :( http://www.coinworld.com/news/cwhl.asp?uID=&hlID=2
|
|
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
I guess W doesn't have any steel stock give a few day and maybe after he gets the stocks needed the bill will pass?
We all know he went in office with a large oil stocks. maybe that way OPEC is getting over $105.00 per barrel?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Edited by jbuck 03/18/2008 2:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
I'm in the steel business.......and stock or no stock .....Dem. or Repub.....rich or poor.......steel is getting more expensive all of the time and harder to get and is affected by the world stage sadly... Besides....I've got quite a few of the old "steel cents".....and I don't want a "modern" one to be made......in fact....keep the design and keep it made out of semi-precious metal please ! (go back to copper even !) If they do that...try to make em' out of steel.....then why not go a step further and make our coins out of plastic (or something similar)? ...Then we could recycle the coinage more economically and practically! Then we could "go green" with our coins too ! You could insulate your house with your pennies,etc. etc. _____________________________________________________________________ AND, since the dollar is "devaluing".....LET'S CONTINUALLY SEE IF WE CAN DEVALUE OUR METAL IN THE COINS TOO ! Let's make them "cheaper" and cheapen their actual "melt value" anywhere we can as well ! Image: praying_for_peace_RD.jpg33.31 KB
Edited by eaglefoot 03/18/2008 3:06 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
I like the copper/nickel/steel clad composition that Canada is using--it may be more durable than our Cu/Zn cent. Quite possibly, we could contract the same supplier and save some hassle. Of course, our 1 cent dies will need redesigning for that new composition.
Edited by KurtS 03/18/2008 2:59 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
I think by steel they mean copper coated steel like the ones used in Canada, not the rust magnets made in 1943!  IIRC, Jarden Zinc makes the copper coated steel planchets for Canada as well as our copper coated zinc ones. The Mint would not even have to change suppliers! The question is, do they behave the same in vending machines, as required by the proposed legislation?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
quote: I wonder if somebody in Bush & Co is buddies with the zinc/planchet supplier?
It doesn't matter if they are the same that company that supplies the Canadian plachets! More likely, they are tied to a Big Oil owned Zinc Mining Consortium! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Jbuck--good info! I did not know that, but it explains why some foreign cent-sized Cu/Zn coins produced by the RCM look identical to our cent planchets (such as the Panama 1c) I know for certain...somebody is going to have to change all those US Coinstar machines! But of course, there's a model used in Canada that might work in that case.
Edited by KurtS 03/18/2008 3:18 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
I wonder if there is a memo somewhere where someone recommended that the US switch to steel the same time Canada did... I can imagine the pro's and con's... but you know if said memo exists, the author is running around with that "I told you so!" attitude!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Oh for the love of God, would you politician-hating conspiracy theorists crawl back under a rock  There is no objection to actually changing to a copper-plated steel planchet, the problem is the wording of the bill contains impractical and limiting restrictions. Thus, he said, "the Department and the United States Mint can support the "Coin Modernization and Taxpayer Savings Act of 2008," but only if two specific objections ... are removed or addressed."
Those two objections:
" the provision mandating five years of consecutive losses because it deprives the United States Mint of needed flexibility to act as quickly.
" it addresses one denomination at a time based on the volatility of metal prices. The vending and coin handling industries would potentially have to repeatedly face costly changes denomination by denomination.
Moy's solution is to re-direct the problem and define a slightly different problem with a ready solution: "we need to consider the relationship of new materials for all of our coins. Regardless of the relationship between production costs and face value, any change in production processes or materials that lowers the cost to produce coinage saves the taxpayer money."
A third objection:
" the requirement that "mandates the production of one-cent coins made primarily of steel 180 days after the enactment of this legislation, without first obtaining any public input." Moy's rationale: that it "restricts the United States Mint's flexibility to ascertain and employ the most cost-effective material and production process time frame."
All told, Moy told the Committee that even changing the cent, in the Mint's view, would be time consuming. "The United States Mint anticipates a reasonable time frame to make these critical decisions to be 18 to 24 months to properly implement this mandate and do our part to bring a penny made primarily of steel to the marketplace."http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis...ticleId=3989
Edited by biokemist6 03/18/2008 3:17 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4867 Posts |
If there were a change in composition I wonder how long the current coins will circulate. Will these be hoarded or will the feds have them melted down?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
"The vending and coin handling industries would potentially have to repeatedly face costly changes denomination by denomination." Somehow the vending industry in Canada managed OK.  "Oh for the love of God, would you politician-hating conspiracy theorists crawl back under a rock" Oh, c'mon--let us have our fun! How serious do you take us to be?  Then again, industry favoritism is not without its precedents. I do recall The Mint's Cu-Ni cent policy to benefit their chum Wharton's Nickel mining interests back in the mid-19C.  "...I wonder how long the current coins will circulate. Will these be hoarded or will the feds have them melted down?" Given the current economic climate, I think the hoarding would be immediate, followed by a redemption policy. There's similarities to the 1860s-70s.
Edited by KurtS 03/18/2008 3:45 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
Biokemist, that was a much better article than the two I found!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
533 Posts |
quote: it addresses one denomination at a time based on the volatility of metal prices. The vending and coin handling industries would potentially have to repeatedly face costly changes denomination by denomination.
When was the last time any of you ever put or received a penny from a vending machine? 1960? I'm 27 and I can't ever remember doing it, unless you count the bucking bronco at the grocery stor that I used to ride for a penny... yeeeeeehaaaaaa!!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187702 Posts |
The only time I have ever used a cent is at the post office. None of the machines in my work building take the cent and the toll road seems to reject them. I do not use a lot of vending, so I am probably not qualified to confirm or deny the prevalence of cent-accepting machines!  Edit: the proposed legislation does affect the Nickel as well, and that denomination is accepted by the machines at work!
Edited by jbuck 03/18/2008 4:42 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
quote: "The vending and coin handling industries would potentially have to repeatedly face costly changes denomination by denomination."
Somehow the vending industry in Canada managed OK.
Yes, but didn't Canada change from the copper and nickel based coinage to plated steel at the same time? This piece of legislation only authorizes the change for cents and excludes all other denominations. The fact that productions costs for the nickel(five cent coin) exceed face value has been ignored and if the bill passed as-is, another bill would need to be submitted for the nickel. quote: Then again, industry favoritism is not without its precedents
Hello, Bland-Allison Act 
|
| |
Replies: 47 / Views: 3,515 |