| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
I'm not sure if I'm just seeing things, but I believe this is a "phantom" MM behind the 5 in the date. In Microsoft Paint, I blew up the image to 400%. I created a "D" from the original MM and pasted over the "phantom" MM. The inner arc and other points seems to match up perfectly. I'm I just seeing things or is this legit?   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5530 Posts |
Sorry, all I see is some PMD. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11994 Posts |
That's just a stain, not an RPM. It's Post Strike Damage (it happened after it left the U.S. Mint). This is called paradollia. That's when your mind see things that aren't actually there.
Errers and Varietys
|
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
I took a couple angled images. Wouldn't PMD show signs of gouging? It looks like part of the 5 is going out following the shape where the MM would be.   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11994 Posts |
There's no RPM as I already said.
Errers and Varietys
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
28168 Posts |
Possibly a die chip or stain or some sort, but whatever it is, it's not a misplaced mintmark.  |
|
New Member
United States
19 Posts |
Just wishful thinking. The eyes sees what they want to see.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6460 Posts |
Plus weren't MM's placed last on the dies - so no way to put one under the numbers in the date.
Did you know that dolphins are so smart that within a few days of captivity, they can train people to stand on the very edge of the pool and throw them fish? Working on a Dansco 8167 Kennedy half album while waiting for the 8166's to become back in stock. |
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
392 Posts |
In order to get the mint mark under the date it would have had to have hit the die after the date was put in. I see what your talking about though. It's def raised so it's not a stain. Maybe that particular area of the die got dented in by something? But if that is the case, wouldn't it be possible that when the MM was stamped in the die, the punch jumped/bounced when being hmered manually and that's where it landed. It's only like a third the height as the other devices which is what you would expect happen in a bounce. Not saying that's what it is, prob just a dent but am I talking crazy for theorizing that or does it happen from time to time? Feel free to tell me it's rediculous or explain why it's not possible, genuinely trying to learn something.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
31829 Posts |
It is not raised like a miss punch would make. It is just a stain. Also it is too small to be a mint mark.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11994 Posts |
 To CCF JLAM2018! It's nice to see new members join CCF! I hope you post more on CCF in the future. 
Errers and Varietys
|
|
Valued Member
United States
392 Posts |
So it's not raised at all? It looks raised in my pics. Oh well. I posted a penny a while back that has the same anomoly as the penny JLAM posted except it's on the first 9 and it's a 1958. I'm gonna repost it in a new thread. Would like to revisit it
|
|
Moderator
United States
60204 Posts |
to the Community, JLAM2018!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1309 Posts |
There’s not enough there to determine if it is truly another mintmark punch or not.
It’s in a common place for die chips, could it be a die crack?
|
| |
Topic |
|
Posted 07/10/2018 3:33 pm
