Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

Mexico Republic 8 Reales 1842 Zs Om CCc

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
New Member
United States
15 Posts
 Posted 01/18/2020  6:24 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Augustus49 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Here is a coin "not-for-sale" that I found at a coin show a few months back.

I had no opportunity to weigh it, but it is obviously a contemporary circulating counterfeit.

The dealer let me take a photo with my phone camera so that I could study it at home.

I noted many defects in design as noted, but I cannot translate to a Riddell number, if any, as my PDF of his work is just not of high enough resolution.
Valued Member
United States
423 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2020  02:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add RealPeso to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hello,

I am thinking Riddell No. 274

Too bad the weight wasn't available but it does look like a contemporary counterfeit.
Pillar of the Community
United States
4111 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2020  09:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


Looks like No.274 to me also. Despite a fineness determined to be just .150, Riddell shows the weight for this type the same as genuine.

Colligo ergo sum
Pillar of the Community
United States
4912 Posts
 Posted 01/22/2020  01:15 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Augustus49 The coin you picture is without a doubt an example struck from the same dies that made the Riddell # 274.

The Riddell # 274 is an extremely common counterfeit type, so there is a good opportunity to examine many specimens. I have over 50 examples of that type family in my collection. I identify 3 major die versions and at least two mules of die pairs (there are likely more). There is also a version mated with an 1836 Zs OM cap die which uses ONLY one of the three reverse die types. (I am looking for others.) In addition to the major die varieties, I note several sub-varieties based on the dies being recut while in service.

The dies were used for an extended period of time until they were entirely worn out. During that time period several different alloys were employed. The earliest examples are the debased silver versions made of a solid low grade silver alloy. The Riddell coin is this type. There are also Sheffield plate varieties using the silver over German silver core alloy. That is a later date Sheffield plate developed in the late 1830s. I have located one example struck in a copper alloy that lacks any silver plate at all. That points to either a silver amalgam wash - an early technology dating to well before 1800 or possibly the survival of the dies until electroplating arrived on the scene in the late 1840's. I also own a cast version using the same design which could mean the dies were used to prepare a mold after they were no longer serviceable for use as dies for striking.

I know in my case, that I did not notice that my collection contained 2 entirely different die types until one day when I was sorting my coins at the bank and I noticed that the eagle's claw on some appeared to have two toes grasping the snake while there were three toes on others. After I completed my point by point comparison I had over a dozen variations in details which I had not noticed.

These particular dies were far from hubbed, the eagle itself was not even created from a single punch. So recognizing that can help when looking for die variations.

So my point here is that caution must be maintained when looking at counterfeits to compare the coins point by point - covering different die punch areas before pronouncing the dies to be a match or not.

Here is a blow-up of an 1836 version of the two toe die.



Notice the numerous small hand cut details that are visible just in this tiny area. I see that as evidence usable to identify not only the die variety (two toe) but the die state itself when comparing coins.
My book on Counterfeit Portrait 8Rs is available from Amazon http://ccfgo.com/TheUnrealReales or from me directly if you want it signed.
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Coin Community Member eBay Sales

Certified Coins   Certified VAMs   Certified Errors  




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2020 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2020 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.5 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05