| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,356 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
422 Posts |
I do apologize for the pictures of doing my phone my microscope burned up
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4135 Posts |
looks good to me. Nice find
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
To me seem to be an Close AM. In order to be Wide AM the distance between A & M and M & E are equal. If you click the link I will put here you can have more informations, or go to COOP links here. WAM |
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
Really looks like a WAM. I mean been told my 92's that look similar are WAM's. But only asking cause I'm no professional and like insight Edited by hlw1976
03/03/2022 12:28 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
 Sorry for the lighting but phone don't like to get to close to anything  Edited by hlw1976
03/03/2022 01:02 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2775 Posts |
With current images I'd think WAM. Note the "A" in STATES. Thanks, Doug. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
I have to recognize that the seconds photos are better. I will go for WAM |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10635 Posts |
I vote for a WAM.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Close mint mark placement..WAM.  |
|
Moderator
 United States
96989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8775 Posts |
Nice find, congrats!
-makecents-
|
|
Valued Member
United States
422 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Clearly a WAM. @Silviosi I see you making incorrect negative assertions like this in far too many posts. Please do more research and take more time looking at the coins you're responding to. Misinformation can be very confusing for new collectors. |
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,356 |
|
Posted 03/02/2022 10:56 pm
