| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,000 |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
326 Posts |
Hi All, I bought this one at the LCS over the weekend. I got it at AU price so no worries but the flip said UNC. I'm curious what you think.   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
tough call from photos, AU-58 probably, but if it shows luster then perhaps MS-63
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
326 Posts |
It does have some luster so maybe MS.
|
|
Moderator
United States
194816 Posts |
Nice addition!  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not the best pics, but certainly not less than AU-58.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
326 Posts |
I think I need to be in the market for a new phone/camera. Maybe a Pixel. Seems that my photos, either with the micro cam or current phone, are never that great. Thanks for the grade opinions all the same. ( and the patience with the pics) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
luster is very tough to photograph, there's really no good substitute for holding a coin in one's hand then angling it to see how light reflects off its surfaces to look for luster's cartwheel effect
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18877 Posts |
coins above XF40 may have some level of luster remaining. the lighting is not the best to grade from which makes it challenge to see the remaining luster and determine circulation wear. based on what I see the coin looks AU58. all the high points seem to have signs of circulation.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
326 Posts |
Thanks Nick10 and Panzaldi
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
nice looking coin....
I say AU-55.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36940 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
326 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,000 |
|
Posted 10/17/2022 3:25 pm
