Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Statistical Analysis Of Key And Semi-Key Buffalo Nickels

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,548Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
drdave's Avatar
United States
721 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  5:14 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add drdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
For background information, I posted a similar thread on Lincoln Cents:

https://goccf.com/t/88992#735292

Now for the Buffalo nickels. I thought I would treat these as a single group, and also compare my findings with the current price (as found on numismedia.com for G4.)

From the LWC study: key date z-values were found to be -2.2 and less; semi-keys between -2.2 and -1.5.

To get a z-value, I determine the relative standard deviation from the mean (log mintage) values. The results for the "top 10" Buffalo nickels are as follows:

1926-S -2.10
1931-S -1.91
1913-S T2 -1.91
1924-S -1.75
1915-S -1.71
1921-S -1.68
1913-S T1 -1.42
1927-S -0.99
1914-S -0.98
1914-D -0.87

Interestingly, the lowest mintage coin 1926-S is not that low relatively speaking. The top 6 would make semi-key definitions based on the LWC series.

I then compared the price (G4 based on numismedia.com) with these z-values. The graph below shows the log (price) on the y-axis and z-value on the x-axis.
Statistical-Analysis-Of-Key-And-Semi-Key-Buffalo-Nickels
These results are interesting. First of all, the general trend is there (higher prices/lower mintage), but the spread of the data is a lot more than I saw with the other series (LWC, IHC, Mercury dimes, and Walkers).

Comments? Thanks for reading...
Valued Member
AlmostCollectible's Avatar
United States
384 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  5:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AlmostCollectible to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is very interesting, I read some of your other evaluations earlier today as well. Thanks for sharing all this with us!
Pillar of the Community
United States
687 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  9:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add RollHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think buffaloes have the same problem that SLQs have - dates easily worn off. I guess the difference is that the issue was never corrected in the buffalo series, so a lot of the pre-1930 nickels are unidentifiable.
Valued Member
Ca Dreamin's Avatar
United States
149 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  9:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ca Dreamin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This has long since been my favorite series-it would be interesting to see what reliable estimates are for the key/semi key dates, say from vf-ms-I'll bet they are very low. Same with the SLQ's pre 1925.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,548Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.24 seconds to rattle this change. Forums