Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Statistical Analysis Of Key And Semi-Key Buffalo Nickels

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,547Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
drdave's Avatar
United States
721 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  5:14 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add drdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
For background information, I posted a similar thread on Lincoln Cents:

https://goccf.com/t/88992#735292

Now for the Buffalo nickels. I thought I would treat these as a single group, and also compare my findings with the current price (as found on numismedia.com for G4.)

From the LWC study: key date z-values were found to be -2.2 and less; semi-keys between -2.2 and -1.5.

To get a z-value, I determine the relative standard deviation from the mean (log mintage) values. The results for the "top 10" Buffalo nickels are as follows:

1926-S -2.10
1931-S -1.91
1913-S T2 -1.91
1924-S -1.75
1915-S -1.71
1921-S -1.68
1913-S T1 -1.42
1927-S -0.99
1914-S -0.98
1914-D -0.87

Interestingly, the lowest mintage coin 1926-S is not that low relatively speaking. The top 6 would make semi-key definitions based on the LWC series.

I then compared the price (G4 based on numismedia.com) with these z-values. The graph below shows the log (price) on the y-axis and z-value on the x-axis.
Statistical-Analysis-Of-Key-And-Semi-Key-Buffalo-Nickels
These results are interesting. First of all, the general trend is there (higher prices/lower mintage), but the spread of the data is a lot more than I saw with the other series (LWC, IHC, Mercury dimes, and Walkers).

Comments? Thanks for reading...
Valued Member
AlmostCollectible's Avatar
United States
384 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  5:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add AlmostCollectible to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is very interesting, I read some of your other evaluations earlier today as well. Thanks for sharing all this with us!
Pillar of the Community
United States
687 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  9:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add RollHunter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think buffaloes have the same problem that SLQs have - dates easily worn off. I guess the difference is that the issue was never corrected in the buffalo series, so a lot of the pre-1930 nickels are unidentifiable.
Valued Member
Ca Dreamin's Avatar
United States
149 Posts
 Posted 05/21/2011  9:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ca Dreamin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This has long since been my favorite series-it would be interesting to see what reliable estimates are for the key/semi key dates, say from vf-ms-I'll bet they are very low. Same with the SLQ's pre 1925.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,547Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to rattle this change. Forums