| Author |
Replies: 45 / Views: 3,425 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
my 2 cents (I only own 1 and it was given to me), I collect what I can get my hands on. To date, nothing before 1864.....only because I don't know anything about them. The 1864 2 cent piece was given to me by a friend. Up until the past few months, I've never had that nagging urge to complete a series, or an album. But now I'm only one coin away from completing my first album...my Mercury dimes! Hopefuly I'll be able to afford the other coin I need for that by the end of the year!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
764 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
414 Posts |
Too expensive. Althought, I am collecting selectively.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
812 Posts |
I collect almost exclusively classic U.S. coins. I get around the prohibitive expense of completing a set by the way I define "completing a set". For example: I bought a Whitman plastic year set holder (cent - half dollar). I labeled it "Appomattox." My goal was to complete this set. The requirements were to have coins that physically fit the holes, were of similar grade, and all dated 1865. I have a 3CN, Indian cent, Seated dime, Two Cent Piece, and Seated Half. They are all VF-30 to EF-45 and all dated 1865. Thus a "completed set." I have many other similar labeled holders, some complete, some not. Some are single years: "Fort Sumter" (1861) and "Remember the Alamo" (1836). Some are time ranges: "Ulysses S. Grant" (1869-77) and "War of 1812" (1812-15). Some are sets grading G-4 to VG-10, some VF-30 to EF-45. (Some have dissimilar grades, which I am working on resolving.) I've completed a number of sets, have several more to go, and can start a new one whenever the mood (and financial resources) strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
I wish there was a logical reason for preferring classical coins, but there is not. There are certain classics that seem to have a siren draw. So I will say they have more "magic" in them.I agree a 3CN is one of those coins. However, the Barber series have no such draw. Probably just the opposite for others. If coins all had the same interest to everyone, it would really be boring  Jim
|
|
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts |
That is an excellent idea Bilbo, I never thought of collecting that way, but it makes perfect sense. My 7070 type set might never get completed but a year set or a theme set of the classics might just be the way to attack it. I think the other thing that stops me is that I just don't have the knowledge needed for the classics so I have to put faith in a dealer. I have one dealer that I buy all my classics so far and have not been disappointed yet.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
666 Posts |
I tend to be working on two sets at any given time and generally one of the two is a classic set. That said, I might be working on the same classic set through the course of completing multiple modern sets. Like others have said I tend to shy away from those sets which I have no likelihood of ever completing. I alot myself $100 a month to spend on coins and generally break that up with about half going to classics and half going to moderns. It might take me 6 months to save up for that $300 key in the classic series I'm working on, but at the same time I've kept myself busy with the modern set. Of course there are classical sets which I'll never attempt such as the Morgans, But there are several classical sets out there which can be completed on even the most limited budget provided you're willing to give it a little time. Like I said I give myself $100 a month to spend... But the dollar amount doesn't really matter as the concept is still the same. Just as a for instance with only three keys the Liberty nickel set isn't that hard to finish. It's the Classical set I'm currently working on. I'm figuring it'll take me close to a year to sock away enough for the 3 keys. But in the meantime I'll also have completed a MS63 Roosevelt set and possibly a MS63 Jefferson set. After I finish the Liberty nickels I think I've decided to work on the Liberty Head (Braided Hair) Cent... With only 1 key it should be a pretty easy set to put together in VG. At $50 a month I'm thinking I can squeeze it together in less than a year. Another set which can be put together fairly easily is the Two Cents. If you take out the 1 key an AU set isn't out of reach... If the completed set is of more importance you can do an AG set on the cheap as well that includes the 1873 (you can pick up AG's of those in the $250 range, but the others would be chump change comparatively). The Peace dollar set might be considered classical... I don't know... it sort of fits the definition. I picked a good time to start my set so was able to pick up the keys before they went insane, but even now a VG-XF set could probably be put together in 18 months on a $50 a month allowance. If you figure the 28 at $300 and the 21 at $150 that's half the time, the others can be picked up for close to silver value. The Barber dimes can be completed in AG-F as well. It'll take some time since there are so many semi-keys in the $100 range in addition to the 95-0, but it can be done (I did it). But for me it helps to be working on a modern set as well. If I was only working on classics, I'm sure I would become frustrated.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Uh, because I already have most of them. (For some reason I only seem to be interested in the small denominations, five cents or less.) the only things I don't have are the Half Cents and the flowing hair and draped bust Half Dimes. Most of the Half Cents I could probably do other than the 1796 and the proof only years, but the Half Dimes are probably not within my reach.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
164 Posts |
I suppose I am like many others. I am working on a 19th century type set, and have most of the types. There are a few which are pricey. In addition, I am working on several sets.
As for being turned on, there is for me a fascination for the early large cents. I only have a couple. I am trying to find a liberty cap one in VG condition, but that for me has not been easy. Can find them in AG, but why get an AG. I had one many years ago and about the only thing you could do was identify the type and see the date.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts |
The price vs. my income keeps me from collecting MORE classic U.S. coins. If I had more money to spend, I would certainly spend more on coins!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
543 Posts |
My poor budgeting skills!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Nothing is stopping me  My main focus is my 19th and 20th century Dansco type album but I also pick up the occasional uncommon/eye appealing classic coin in addition to anything I buy for the album. As an example, my bid board purchases from last week were a 1913-S Barber dime and an 1881 3CN  It is easy to find nice moderns in most cases. The real hunt is to look for that almost perfect(for the grade) 100-150 year old circulated coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5953 Posts |
Thanks Prethen. Its already hard enough to find nice examples of my favorite coin now here you go encouraging others to go after them and make it doubly difficult for me :-)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
since I mostly collect from rolls and coinmachines I have difficulty collecting what I cant find but, when someone dumps their collection of quarter eagles or large cents into the machine at work ill start collecting them too
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
I think it's a factor of all four choices, with more weight on them being more expensive.
|
| |
Replies: 45 / Views: 3,425 |