| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,002 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2225 Posts |
I thought it was time to upgrade and came across this one. What do you think? Original 1884 S   Upgraded 1884 S 
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
76286 Posts |
Nice upgrade.  Looks better than your old one.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Condition-wise I'd say the "upgrade" is a grade or two higher (XF vs. low AU). If this is the only picture the seller provided I'd ask for some full slab pics of the coin. It's darkly toned in the TrueView and could be even darker in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3848 Posts |
First one is XF-40, second looks to be 50 or 53. Lovely!
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1523 Posts |
That's a great upgrade! New one looks to be around an AU53 from the TruView
|
|
Moderator
 United States
191802 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
The picture of the new one looks nice - how's it compare to in hand? Definitely is an upgrade! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 2225 Posts |
The up grade is graded AU 50. In hand it doesn't look as good as the photo but still much better than the old.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
10601 Posts |
Quote: In hand it doesn't look as good as the photo but still much better than the old. Nice! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3689 Posts |
 The 1884-S is a condition toughie, for sure. You did well. IMHO, it's on the higher end of AU-50.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18783 Posts |
i think your upgrade could go as high as AU55
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36916 Posts |
Nice upgrade. Looks AU-55 to me also.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,002 |
|