Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Difference In Finishes Between P And D Modern Quarters Or My Imaginaton?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 136Next Topic  
New Member
jboehm's Avatar
United States
3 Posts
 Posted Today  8H 37M ago Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add jboehm to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
When I was quarter hunting it seemed D had a more pronounced shine where P has a more satin finish.
Edited by jboehm
Today 8H 36M ago
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34485 Posts
 Posted Today  7H 58M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm interested to see what others think, but as far as I know, there is no difference in finish between mints on circulation coins. Perhaps you live a little closer to the Denver mint as compared to the Philadelphia mint, so those quarters had passed through a few more hands by the time they got to you?
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Bedrock of the Community
ijn1944's Avatar
United States
19333 Posts
 Posted Today  7H 37M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ijn1944 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've noticed similar over the years--not deeply pervasive, but yes.
Valued Member
United States
61 Posts
 Posted Today  6H 40M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Roller42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Same here. Some definitely seem to have a satin finish and it is not from circulation, to my eyes.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
191622 Posts
 Posted Today  5H 9M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I've noticed similar over the years--not deeply pervasive, but yes.

Quote:
Same here. Some definitely seem to have a satin finish and it is not from circulation, to my eyes.
I agree. It is noticeable enough that I can probably guess the mint mark >80% of the time.

It has been discussed before, I will try to find some topics...
Pillar of the Community
Vector Ze's Avatar
United States
597 Posts
 Posted Today  3H 31M ago  Show Profile   Check Vector Ze's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Vector Ze to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Depending on how common these satin finish coins are, is there a possibility they're escapees from the satin finish coins included in 2005-2010 US Mint Sets, maybe never included in the sets but from the same runs?
By the same token, since 2011 Mint Sets have featured the "Brilliant" finish.
So, for over 20 years the Mints have been cranking out coins with finishes that are not typical business strikes.

Just tossing random thoughts in the air. In either case, I wouldn't think these would constitute a significant part of the population.
Edited by Vector Ze
Today 3H 25M ago
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
191622 Posts
 Posted Today  2H 37M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It really goes back further than that. The Mint only acknowledged there was a difference (by calling them Brilliant Finish) after the satin finish was abandoned in 2011.

After the 1965-1967 SMS run, uncirculated mint set coins continued to be made differently. They were still minted on different presses (lower speed & higher pressure) with fresher dies and received better handling than typical business strike coins. This may have not been the norm, and some mixing may have occurred, but their distinction from regular business strikes coins has been certain since the the sets resumed in 1984 and the press lines were separated.

I am pulling this from memory. Cladking may come along and correct some things for me.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34485 Posts
 Posted Today  2H 18M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ah well looks like I'm learning something today then. Thx all for the gentle course correction on my answer to the OP's question.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Pillar of the Community
Vector Ze's Avatar
United States
597 Posts
 Posted Today  2H 8M ago  Show Profile   Check Vector Ze's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Vector Ze to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You've probably motivated me to pull out some of my earlier Mint Sets to take a look, jbuck. The coins have always been nice BU, but I thought that prior to 2005 they were basically business strikes that were given special care.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
191622 Posts
 Posted Today  1H 54M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe an overlap in condition is expected. The best made, early die stage business strike probably has better eye appeal than the worst late stage mint set coin. The question is, how broad is the overlap.

I have mentioned in other posts that I have been filling my album holes with mint set coins the last seven years after almost exclusively pulling them from circulation the previous forty (NCLT issues being the normal exception). I can barely perceive any difference between them and my freshest pulls, and even that is when I really look at them. For the most part, everything blends in. That is, except when comparing same year P&D coins. You know, what started this topic.
Pillar of the Community
Vector Ze's Avatar
United States
597 Posts
 Posted Today  1H 10M ago  Show Profile   Check Vector Ze's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Vector Ze to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
jbuck, I have a long history of sidetracking threads, I apologize for that.
I thought I might have something to add. Maybe not.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
191622 Posts
 Posted Today  1H 3M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Note really a sidetrack! I believe it was relevant to the discussion. We want to get all the possibilities on the table for review.
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 136Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums