| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 116 |
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year and/or Mintmark and/or Denomination to Title. It's essential to have it in the title.  ***Please let me know the following on this 1880 CC GSA: Grade? PL? DMPL? VAM? Thank-you!! I UPDATED THIS POST TO INCLUDE: Proof Like and DMPL tests at 4" and 6"....and it shows the word "NOTES" in green...as well as a picture to determine the VAM. The second "8" has a bar under it. Thank-you!!        Edited by DrapedBust1776
Today 45M ago
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7666 Posts |
Kinda looks like it would be PL but is awfully "scruffy" in certain areas. Not at all unusual as the GSA dollars were carted all over the country in the 1900's. As far as a grade goes I'd give it a "62 PL". As far as the VAM goes IDK. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18787 Posts |
all CC morgans were boldly struck. the ear and hair around the ear are on the weak side. the breast is quite flat. there is some cameo look to it due to the PL surfaces. shes been banged around a little. assessing mirror depth without a point of reference, like newsprint, is just a guess. she looks PL but need that reference for anything deeper.
PF61 maybe 62 PL
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
736 Posts |
I would guess ms62 maybe PL depending on the reverse
I've been collecting for a couple years... Favorite Coin's are Standing Liberty quarters, Working on my type set | Coffee, Corvettes, Coins & the CCF what could be better? |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1808 Posts |
MS-61. Lots of chatter in the fields and on her cheek. From the image I don't see it being PL, but it is nearly impossible to see from images. Here is my similar coin that was just graded at CACG, https://goccf.com/t/490370. |
|
Moderator
 United States
191937 Posts |
I see it as low MS and not PL.
MS-61, a MS-62 at best.
|
|
New Member
 United States
46 Posts |
Panzaldi, I uploaded some pictures of print for your review.
Thank-you!!
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
psuman08 - that is rough... CACG may have graded too harshly on that coin. Usually, the chatter is overlooked when you have frost, PL with regards to PCGS, NGC.. I would resubmit.. That's AT LEAST a 64.. if not 65
|
|
Moderator
United States
191937 Posts |
Quote:
Panzaldi, I uploaded some pictures of print for your review. I revise my earlier opinion. I believe it is Proof Like, possibly DMPL. The additional photos show what the first were missing. |
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
Panzaldi - thanks friend for taking a second look :) That was my fault for not including.. Any shot at DMPL?
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
jbuck, I updated my pics - would you mind taking a second look? thank-you!!
|
|
Moderator
United States
191937 Posts |
We were cross-posting. I replied just before you.  |
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
jbuck, panzaldi... ooooppsss I thought jbuck's post was yours panzaldi. If YOU could take a second look, I would appreciate it :)
Thanks guys!!
|
|
Moderator
United States
191937 Posts |
Quote:
jbuck, panzaldi... ooooppsss I thought jbuck's post was yours panzaldi. An honest mistake. |
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
191937 Posts |
I believe it may be. When I click to view the full-size images, the reflections are quite clear.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 116 |
|
Posted Today 2H 21M ago
