Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1896-S Morgan Silver Dollar - Potential New VAM

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Replies: 7 / Views: 165Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
351 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2026  6:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add UnimpossibIe to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

1896-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar---Potential-New-VAM

Valued Member
United States
351 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2026  6:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add UnimpossibIe to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe that both dies may be unique to this example. VAM-2 looks like the correct date position but the pickups don't match. The mintmark appears to be lower than any of the known 1896-S Reverses. Questions and comments are welcomed.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
2367 Posts
 Posted 08/07/2026  12:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add smat45 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not a VAM'r per se...unless it's obvious, but the MM position does seem a bit lower per the MintMark Guide on VAMWorld https://www.vamworld.com/wiki/1896-...tMark_Guide.
Perhaps your picture is not as straight on as the one on VAMWorld?
smat
Valued Member
United States
351 Posts
 Posted 08/07/2026  12:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add UnimpossibIe to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the reply smat. The pictures were taken from directly above with a microscope and the MM position in the pictures matches the coin itself.
Pillar of the Community
MrPink2018's Avatar
United States
2591 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   05:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MrPink2018 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
you may be right. have you presented this to the people at VAMworld?
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
2367 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   06:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add smat45 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
you may be right. have you presented this to the people at VAMworld?

That's exactly what I was thinking since that IS their main focus.
Keep us updated.
smat
Valued Member
United States
351 Posts
 Posted Yesterday   11:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add UnimpossibIe to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I posted pictures to VAMWorld at the beginning of the week. I got a few replies, most of them regarding the coins authenticity. John Baumgart (messydesk) commented that the mint mark position is "decidedly low" and that one die pair with a low mint mark was identified during a study but it had a normally positioned date. I haven't had any new replies for a few days so I figured I'd see what the Coin Community thought. Thanks smat & MrPink2018 for the feedback, I appreciate it.
Pillar of the Community
MrPink2018's Avatar
United States
2591 Posts
 Posted Today  56M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MrPink2018 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
well... there are very few listings for that date & mint. the mm's positioning doesn't seem to match anything there. admittedly, when I first looked at your pix, the very low mm stuck out, as did the near or very near date. I don't know if I'm seeing any doubling on the date, maybe-- *maybe*-- some on the 8 & 9. also looks like maybe tiny die chips between the 8's outer loops, which isn't uncommon, but could be a pick-up point. the clashing in the usual places is easy to see. does any of the clashing look doubled? is there a bit of a clashed n at Liberty's neck? and do you see any other doubling of any of the devices? I don't see any major die cracks, though I think I see a small one connecting the tops of the letters N & I in UNITED. does the mm look doubled or repunched?

Edited by MrPink2018
Today 54M ago
  Replies: 7 / Views: 165Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.26 seconds to rattle this change. Forums