| Author |
 Replies: 27 / Views: 3,762 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1432 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
to the middle-right of the cap, right of the wing and under the chin. With the 2nd C touching the wreath. I need to buy coins where you do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
Interesting coin. The MM and die crack through DOLLAR look like the V-2, however no mention of clashed version. Looks like your coin has a better than average single clash. Check for any transferred lettering on both sides carefully. You may have a coin worthy of submittal for designation. nlp
|
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
Hello, I do not think VAM-2, it does not show the clash in v2. Maybe a new VAM. Wait for the masters. Edward M. |
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
Hello, I do not think VAM-2, it does not show the clash in v2. Maybe a new VAM. Wait for the masters. Edward M. |
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
Hello, I do not think VAM-2, it does not show the clash in v2. Maybe a new VAM. Wait for the masters. Edward M. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1432 Posts |
These 2 pics are from vamworld VAM2. Scroll down to the 3rd example.   |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The presence or absence of clashing doesn't really mean anything with VAM attribution unless the clash is listed as a specific pickup for the subvariety. As in, for instance, VAM-2A is not clashed while VAM-2B is. Morgans clashed often enough that it can be reasonably assumed that just about every variety could have a clashed stage. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
The date placement and the die cracks all positively point directly at VAM 2.. I noticed the clash is so strong that it could possible have the IN clash as well as a possible ST clash...definetly a new VAM!here's a crop of what I'm seeing...so what you think...G  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
SD is correct, if there is no letter transfer they accept there will be no attribution given, and VAM A does not always mean its a Clashing, but the order of discovery,,if the doubled ear was discovered after the oringinal VAM the next would be the assigned letter for its attribution...I'm in the middle of moving so have been in a hurry, as the clashing is shown way down at the bottom of the page..the remaining question is, "is there positive letter transfer"..if not no new VAM... |
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Sure looks like there is letter transfer... give us a closeup of the neck clash, the hair Vee, and IGWT on the reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1432 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3076 Posts |
try a close up of the hair Vee,, the INGWT should include the wing yet its not a real focus point as we know the Vam2 has the wing clash...it's the letter transfer of the hair Vee and the neck clash is the most important thing to focus on for a true letter transfer...the hair Vee is most promising...
If your not sure what a hair Vee is check VM world for a better idea of just were to focus your attention..A letter transfer of either the neck N clash or within the hair vee would assure a new designation....G
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Exactly what gene said... It sure looks like letter transfer in the hair-vee... The hair vee above the second right star, NOT the date. (looks like a T clash, maybe ST but need a better shot)
Would probably need to see the coin in hand to determine if there is clashing in front of the neck... But there could be a clashed G? We need a full shot of IGWT that includes the wing under IN GOD... Get a shot of IGWT that has everything from the eagles neck up to the top of the reverse of the coin...
I am pretty sure ( darn near positive) I see clashing in the Vee
Edited by remmy1100
10/25/2011 10:30 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1432 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 3,762 |
Posted 10/23/2011 3:31 pm
