| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,556 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
558 Posts |
What grade do you think she got. I'll post results later.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
nice color on this coin I think because of the leg its in AU condition.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
565 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4778 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 with hesgut. Also, interesting tones on the obverse. I like it!
|
|
New Member
United States
26 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
558 Posts |
Moral of the story - Buy the coin not the slab. I don't know what the rationale for the higher grade was. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
Man was I the kid nobody wants on the team playing right field on this one! Congrats on the great grade (and coin)! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
Crazy!
The details in the picture look good enough to make a judgment, but you're the only one that has the coin in hand, so I ask, that is wear we are seeing correct?
If so, this is one of the worst graded examples I have ever seen from PCGS. Even if that isn't wear all up her leg and gown, there are way too many minor hits to deserve a 64.
If I were you, I'd sell this coin. Right now you have an AU somebody is gonna pay a lot of money for. You could get paid, buy a coin that looks better than this one, and still have money left over.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
516 Posts |
I took the wear to be toning.. it's the same color as the toning in other areas. The amount of luster, combined with the reverse scratches potentially being on the holder, led me to believe it was a 64/65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
Too late for an unbiased opinion, but I agree with MS. Luster in the fields is unbroken and the spots on leg and shield that look like wear are "luster grazes" such as you see on the cheek of an MS63 Morgan dollar. Surfaces appear original. The 64 grade might be a tad too high. The FH designation I think is correct since Liberty shows all required features: earhole, three leaf sprigs, and full edge of hairline from brow down to neck. Probably not a PQ coin for the grade but not drastically overgraded IMO.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
maybe that was just toning on the leg.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
I had thought MS too, and agree wholeheartedly with the 64 FH grade. The coin doesn't have chatter to warrant anything less and non of the typical circulation hairlines/marks.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,556 |