Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Design Of American Coins. What's Up?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 923Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
Mike's Avatar
United States
2884 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2005  5:15 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Mike to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hello Crew!!!
I would like to know exactly who is behind this big conspiracy not to allow "artistic coins" to be designed and minted? All I read are lots of allegations about he said and she said, but who is to blame, if that is even the correct way to look at it! Let’s take a step back and view it as as a needs matter, rather than a want's issue. The bottom line is a small minority of Americans pay any attention to their coins and currency. It does not seem to be a pressing issue. I see no grand scheme or plot from behind the scenes at work here. I'm glad that throughout history some have stepped forward (Roosevelt for example) and pointed out how drab our coins were compared to the rest of the world, otherwise today we would not have many of the wonderful coins we have from the past. Things are just not the same in the world of global media. The grand Eagles and Lady Liberties of coins past were perhaps some people’s only view to what our country was all about. Symbolism was very important and many American coins were designed and minted that "delivered a message" to the rest of the world. I don't think that applies in the same way today. Money is viewed by most people as a tool. Once precious metals were removed from coins it further diminished the interest people had in coins. For example, look how beautiful the ASE's and American Gold coins are now as well as many modern commemoratives. All we can do is hope for a rebirth of the patriotic interest in coins that past generations seem to have had! Sadly, in America that's like to trying to get better roads built before they build the subdivision! No one cares or does anything until after the traffic causes a problem! As I stated before we’re a "Country of fixers". When things gets bad enough or this issue creates enough attention, changes will occur. One final note, this "problem" is not related to any particular political party as America has had a pretty good mix in the White House, Congress and Senate over the last 40 years or so! Mike
Edited by Mike
05/09/2005 01:26 am
Pillar of the Community
United States
2724 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2005  7:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add national dealer to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Who makes the decisions?

The Treasurer of the United States is supposed to do this, as the authority falls squarely in this office. However, the past 4 treasurers have publicly stated that "they" are not worthy of removing a president off of the coins.
Fast forward to 2003. The U.S. Mint was making an it known that an aniversary of the Lewis and Clark exposition was in the mix. Virginian legislators quickly wrote a bill in the house of Representatives to make the Jefferson - Monticello a permanent design. Offer that it was to honor the third president.
No American outcry was heard. Even collectors would not organize to stop this from happening.
Forward to 2005. There are several in congress looking to make the 5 current designs permanent. Again, the average American has no clue. Collectors will not step up and make their voices heard.
So with lack of direction, the U.S. Congress has been making the rules as they go. They are currently BREAKING the law as they have no authority on any coin design change AFTER it has circulated for 25 years. (All 5 coins have met this requirement) Sac dollar has to be changed by congress as it has not met the 25 year minimum.
Congress is trying to take the authority away from the treasurer to insure that NO president is removed from any coin. (Again this is BREAKING the law).

In 1909 they stood up and LIED claiming that it was only tradition of having our coin designed with Lady Liberty, when in fact, statute 1 written in 1792 made it very clear that NO person living or dead was to be on our coins. In fact it was supposed to be an image emblimatic of Lady Liberty.

The process as it works now:
House and Senate = banking and finance committee.
House vote
Senate vote
Presidential signature.

NONE of which is supposed to happen, unless a design change is necessary before the 25 year period.

How to change it? People must make their voices heard. Demand that congress get out of the COIN business. They surely have more important worries to concern themselves with than who is on our coins.
Rest in Peace
Mike's Avatar
United States
2884 Posts
 Posted 05/06/2005  11:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mike to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
ND, thanks for the answer and straightening out some misconceptions I've had about how coins come to be minted in America. It confirmed what I suspected, that no one individual or group is campaigning against artistic designs on coins. Most people would not care if our coins merely stated their value and nothing else. I always thought it was that no living person could appear on our currency or coinage. With respect to statute 1 from 1792 (I thought some of these were more like guidelines, not laws) designers around that time in rather large numbers sought to put Washington on coins anyway (curious as reportedly this was against his will at the time and later done anyway!) and that the 25-year rule was implemented for cost effectiveness and to prevent rapid "wanton" changing of designs, not to insure fresh designs every 25 years. Were not other statutes in the past provided at times,that all denominations of silver or Gold carry the same designs for economic reasons?(again ignored in modern coinage). I think the "rules" have never been followed, or at least bent if not broken entirely, mostly by the lobby of a few who were interested in such things. Again there is no plot to prevent beautiful coins, just complacency. Mike
Edited by Mike
05/07/2005 9:05 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
2724 Posts
 Posted 05/09/2005  07:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add national dealer to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
quote:
I think the "rules" have never been followed, or at least bent if not broken entirely, mostly by the lobby of a few who were interested in such things. Again there is no plot to prevent beautiful coins, just complacency. Mike


Rules are meant to be broken. The few rules written about coins and currency are still intact for the most part. They are simply ignored because most people have no idea that there are rules to follow.
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 923Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.22 seconds to rattle this change. Forums