| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,261 |
|
|
Member
United States
703 Posts |
I have a coin that I am considering bidding on that has some nice toning... but I'm not sure if it's real toning or shake and bake toning.
I don't want to post it because I don't want to advertise someting I might want to bid on.
Any suggestions?
Thanks//btw the coin is over 140 years old
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by Errorcoins
I have a coin that I am considering bidding on that has some nice toning... but I'm not sure if it's real toning or shake and bake toning.
I don't want to post it because I don't want to advertise someting I might want to bid on.
Any suggestions?
Thanks//btw the coin is over 140 years old
Error, Post the pictures with the date cropped or just the reverse picture.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
954 Posts |
Just make sure the seller has a good return policy and buy it.  Then you can decide with it in hand, and can show us a picture.
|
|
Member
 United States
703 Posts |
ok here are some blacked out images no guesses of the type of coin for now please Image: aobv.jpg66.06 KB Image: arev.jpg59.1 KB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
954 Posts |
I wouldn't worry about it to much. It's really not the kind of toning that people pay a premium for.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
From the images provided, the obverse has a splotchy, funky look to it and the toning actually detracts from the coin. I lean towards cooked, but would have to see the coin in hand or much better pictures. If in doubt, pass!
|
|
Member
 United States
703 Posts |
thanks, actually the toning on the whole coin, without a blacked out area looks great imo.
I'm just not sure if it's been cleaned, treated, and baked.
The tone on the rev looks funny to me in relation to the obverse.
Edited by Errorcoins 01/08/2007 8:28 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
That one is too close to the line for me to endorse it. Yes, it could be NT, but for my money it isn't. Older stuff just didn't usually tone like that, so at best (in my opinion), it's modern toning over an older cleaning. I'd take a pass.
|
|
Member
 United States
703 Posts |
Dave Thanks, that's what I thought .. it is pretty for AT if that's what it is as I suspected. Thanks..... Here's the obverse .... Image: c639_1-1.jpg.jpg40.62 KB
Edited by Errorcoins 01/08/2007 8:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
440 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
402 Posts |
quote: Originally posted by hadleydog
From the images provided, the obverse has a splotchy, funky look to it and the toning actually detracts from the coin. I lean towards cooked, but would have to see the coin in hand or much better pictures. If in doubt, pass!
I agree with PASS!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,261 |
|