Quote:
So apparently this bill would grade VF20 if not for the stains, rips, tears, pin holes and the burned corner that has been taped?
Yeah, and CU65 if it had never been folded, creased, dirtied...
Quote:
VF: An attractive note [we can stop right there], but with more evidence of handling and wear. May have a number of folds both horizontally and vertically.
Paper may have minimal [!] dirt, or possible color smudging. Paper itself is still relatively crisp [like where it's burnt to a crisp?] and not floppy.
There are no tears into the border area [!], although the edges do show slight wear. [!] Corners also show wear, but not full rounding. [three corners completely gone]
Fine: Tears may not extend into the design. [!]
VG: ...tiny nicks, tears may extend into the design...
Good: No large pieces of the note may be missing [!]
Fair: Large pieces may be half torn off or missing...
Poor: May have tape holding pieces of the note together.
--Std Cat, page 2.
This is the ultimate example of market grading. New Mexico is one of the toughest states, so rather than grade the note
poor, which it is, they grade it
vf to indicate it should bring vf money.
A big problem with that is we now know we can't trust a vf note to be better than poor condition.
Smaller problems: Anyone who knows absolutely nothing about paper money scarcity isn't going to understand market grading, either, so they're not helping neophytes. Anyone even vaguely familiar with nationals knows this is a rare note, and doesn't need any "help" determining its value.